Posted on 07/20/2004 10:47:03 AM PDT by cyncooper
I wonder if he will delay his return?!
I think this Thursdays Commission Report will be delayed as events continue to develop.
Unless you're a former Clinton official yourself, like Clarke is. All he knows how to say is
"Pass the Kool-Aid, please!"
Did you catch the clip of the Repub Senator's responses on FNC just now .. LOL
FNC also mentioned that when Sandy returned the documents .. the NA said there where documents they didn't know were missing
One of the documents Sandy took was a leather bound file of documents
I don't know if the Dems on the Commission would allow a delay. I am sure they were counting on using the political report as part of the Dem Convention...
They would just spin this off as a non issue and then go on with their screams of stupidity......The Convention plays to mainly..their constituents....so the truth won't matter.
It may be a mistake not to delay the report....but I just don't see them, or the moderate republicans who they play like a cheap fiddle, delaying the report.
No--I didn't have Fox on. What did they say?
Gosh, I'm back on Fox now. I missed all that.
"Let's not forget: Berger is an advisor to the Kerry campaign."
And don't forget: "advisors" to campaigns end up being officials in an administration if the candidate wins. So if Kerry wins, Berger will probably end up as NSA again, unless he's in jail!
My client wanted nothing other than a larger package, it's as simple as that and he didn't have an empty sock nearby.
You are exactly correct. Bush leads Kerry in polls that ask who would do a better job fighting the WOT. This will add to Kerry's low score. How can he be trusted?
One guess is that earlier drafts mentioned "hijackings" or "planes into buildings" - the final version did not.
But .. remember in a couple of the articles it mentioned Berger had clasified notes from the 90's Mideast Peace talks?
What other documents does Sandy have ??
And what other committes has Sandy reviewed documents from??
Could he have also taken documents from other places also???
I think we can safely say the statement released yesterday by Berger and his attorney was a lie. So among the many questions I have about this episode, I now wonder how many times Sandy "inadvertently" stuffed documents into his pants.
Something evil this way comes...
Please go to your latest ping from me.
Be sure you're sitting down before you
read post #21.
Even liberals dont like being laughed at.
By Thursday, the embarrassment factor will be too high to not delay the report.
...In other words, the "wall of separation" constructed by Jamie Gorelick made it virtually impossible for U.S. authorities to stop Ahmed Rassam, the "Millenium Bomber," by design or intention. It was left to blind luck. The NSC's Millennium After Action Review which, based on Attorney General Ashcroft's testimony, must be devastating in its analysis of not only this event but of the Gorelick policy remains classified. And, most significantly, it's likely the Review's criticisms and warnings were either ignored or rejected by the Clinton Justice Department.
Given all the past intelligence information that has been made public by the 9/11 Commission including the August 6, 2001, President's Daily Brief, which had never before been released there appears to be no legitimate basis for the 9/11 Commission keeping the Review under lock and key. It's time to release it.
Link: http://www.nationalreview.com/script/printpage.asp?ref=/levin/levin200404151634.asp
Now we know that Al Gore had visited the National Archives just before his Rolling Stone photo shoot.
I'm going to need to take some time this evening to pull all these disparate facts together for myself. I need to try to figure out a coherent whole, because right now it's breaking way too fast for me to keep up. It's a tangled mess.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.