Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hastert Statement on Berger Allegations
U.S. Newswire ^ | July 20, 2004

Posted on 07/20/2004 10:21:48 AM PDT by we_will_prevail

7/20/2004 12:54:00 PM

To: National Desk

Contact: John Feehery or Pete Jeffries, 202-225-2800, both of the Office of House Speaker Dennis Hastert

WASHINGTON, July 20 /U.S. Newswire/ -- Today, House Speaker Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.) released the following statement regarding allegations that former National Security Advisor Sandy Berger removed highly classified terrorism documents and handwritten notes from a secure reading room during preparations for the 9/11 Commission hearings:

"I am profoundly troubled by allegations that former National Security Advisor Sandy Berger removed highly classified documents from the National Archives regarding the Clinton Administration's handling of terrorist attacks prior to the September 11th attacks.

"What could those documents have said that drove Mr. Berger to remove them without authorization from a secure reading room for classified documents?

"What information could be so embarrassing that a man with decades of experience in handling classified documents would risk being caught pilfering our nation's most sensitive secrets?

"Did these documents detail simple negligence or did they contain something more sinister? Was this a bungled attempt to rewrite history and keep critical information from the 9/11 Commission and potentially put their report under a cloud?

"It is my understanding that Mr. Berger shoved this classified information into his clothing to smuggle them out of the National Archives. Press reports indicate that Archival staff became concerned when documents began to disappear and specifically marked additional documents to track them. A number of those documents also turned up missing.

"Mr. Berger has a lot of explaining to do. He was given access to these documents to assist the 9/11 Commission, not hide information from them. The American people and the 9/11 families don't want cover-ups when it comes to the War on Terror. They want the truth. And so does the U.S. House of Representatives."


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: sandyberger; soxgate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 221-232 next last
To: Rebelbase

And red meat is so good. Too bad, huh.


121 posted on 07/20/2004 11:07:38 AM PDT by gathersnomoss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: gathersnomoss
Someone on FOX this morning was saying that The White House was not going to touch this. Unbelievable!

It's the proper course to take, to appear above the fray. Let Sandy Berger get tried in the media, they need a juicy story, since the election campaign must look boring to them. We find out that Slick was at least as misinformed as Bush was, more likely, we find that Slick's people strengthened AQ.

The country gets reminded of the fact that the 9/11 terrorists infiltrated this country during the Clinton administration, not on GWB's watch. If the White House beats the drum, no one will be able to hear the press beating it.

122 posted on 07/20/2004 11:08:29 AM PDT by hunter112
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: hershey
Rush warned Bergler not to take any walks in Marcy Park.

What if Bergler was to flip, go into the witness protection program, and really cause the Clintonistas trouble!

123 posted on 07/20/2004 11:09:12 AM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: ItsForTheChildren

"tighty-whiteygate"

Then comes the investigation:

wedgie-gate


124 posted on 07/20/2004 11:09:31 AM PDT by antceecee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar
We need a tape.

But seriously, what are we going to do, impeach Clinton? I don't see Bush sicking the Justice Dept on this one. He is ever so careful to never appear partisan.

125 posted on 07/20/2004 11:09:38 AM PDT by Check_Your_Premises (We have to win the war at home before we can win ANY war abroad!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Badeye

I wonder if Karl Rove had this in mind the other day when he said three huge things would happen before Nov.?


126 posted on 07/20/2004 11:11:00 AM PDT by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun
What if Bergler was to flip, go into the witness protection program, and really cause the Clintonistas trouble!

One theory is he already did flip, long since. That's why he continued to bash Bush even though he already knew his "goose was cooked". So Berger is rolling over on the really big fish - Bubba.

127 posted on 07/20/2004 11:12:16 AM PDT by NutCrackerBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun

I'm sure he is deeply saddened too. seriesly


128 posted on 07/20/2004 11:12:29 AM PDT by BSunday (YES AMERICA CAN !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: pinz-n-needlez

Supposedly he 'forgot' to take his briefcase into the private viewing room, which is why he had to 'stuff his socks and pants'. I wonder if the surveillance camera caught all that on tape. One would presume so.


129 posted on 07/20/2004 11:12:29 AM PDT by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: hershey

"Let's hope republicans weigh the country's safety against their own personal future and decide to do what's right."

Fat Chance!


130 posted on 07/20/2004 11:13:06 AM PDT by gathersnomoss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: TruBluKentuckian
Has any news agency reported if the documents taken were ONLY copies in existance?

Exactly. That is the info I have been waiting for. Everyone is acting as if they are, but if there are other copies of these documents, then there is no evidence of a nefarious deed.

131 posted on 07/20/2004 11:13:52 AM PDT by Check_Your_Premises (We have to win the war at home before we can win ANY war abroad!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Check_Your_Premises

I don't think the White House has a say on who Justice investigates. Remember this was started in October of 2003 by the FBI and the Archives themselves.


132 posted on 07/20/2004 11:13:58 AM PDT by NavySEAL F-16 ("proud to be a Reagan Republican")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: NavySEAL F-16

isn't nice to be able to visualize the Kerry 04 headquarters right now in panic and disarray after this scud lands right in the middle of their convention planning and days before they were to bow down on their knees and worship the 9/11 comission's final report. I bet Kerry personally wrote some of their recommendations.


133 posted on 07/20/2004 11:14:08 AM PDT by epluribus_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: we_will_prevail

the leadership is growing cajones, GOOD 'bout time


134 posted on 07/20/2004 11:14:13 AM PDT by SF Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WoodstockCat

"Prediction:
The unanimous 9/11 report will be be put on hold at the end of the week because of suddenly developed dissenting opinions."

That is exactly what Representative J.D. Hayworth (R-AZ) called for on the House floor this morning around 9am.


135 posted on 07/20/2004 11:14:21 AM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: NavySEAL F-16

Even Tim Russert will have to ask about the socks. Or give up any credibility he has left.


136 posted on 07/20/2004 11:15:18 AM PDT by epluribus_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: hunter112

"If the White House beats the drum, no one will be able to hear the press beating it."

One can hope I guess. We will see. I am not to sure of it though.


137 posted on 07/20/2004 11:15:30 AM PDT by gathersnomoss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Quilla

138 posted on 07/20/2004 11:16:19 AM PDT by js1138 (In a minute there is time, for decisions and revisions which a minute will reverse. J Forbes Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

"What ever it was .. it was pretty damning for Sandy to put his future on the line like he did"


What future? We hope it will be in Prison Orange.


139 posted on 07/20/2004 11:16:19 AM PDT by olinr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: NutCrackerBoy

Actually Kerry is a bigger fish at this moment in history. Hope his scales get scraped in this somehow.


140 posted on 07/20/2004 11:16:59 AM PDT by epluribus_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 221-232 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson