Posted on 07/20/2004 9:54:48 AM PDT by gopwinsin04
Sandy Berger has met much of the day with attorneys.
Among those he has hired is former Clinton administration lawyer Lanny Breuer.
Sources say Breuer has been in contact with prosecutors.
Sources also say Berger is stressing a willingness to cooperate, but investigators have not yet asked to speak with him.
Mr. Berger serves as an informal advisor to Senator John Kerry on national security matters.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
A lawyer? he needs a body guard to worry about Arkanside
He destroyed nothing, he gave copies to his scumball pals so they could prepare their spin at the commission.
Great punchline at 33.
Too much work for the money. Burying bodies, spinning lies, stealing and destroying evidence... Talk about needed a HOT shower at the end of the day!
Hey Sandy, Stay out of Ft. Macy Park.
Is Ham-Berger-lar still listed as a Kerry advisor on his campaign website?
LOL! Yeah, right above Turd Chaser and below Ms Hand Job!
So he "informally" stuffed secret documents in his underwear and "informally" hands them kerry.
Interesting point, "subject of a probe, not a target."
Sincerely asking, is there that much difference?
Another thing I thought about, did Berger more or less assure his own safety, by performing a criminal action in (what seems to be) a blatant way, sure to get caught? In other words, now that he's being criminally investigated, there would be little opportunity to get him unobtrusively out of the picture, a la Ron Brown.
Mr. Brown was planning to blow the whistle, but didn't get a chance to--is Berger safer, now, since there's an investigation out in the press already?
Just a tinfoil thought...
I was just wondering, is Berger helping to assure that he'll live through the investigation? Could he have wanted to get caught?
That's the next domino to fall, Flipper releasing Berger from his informal advisor position.
Their greatest concern ... not being in power, which is a distinct disadvantage when it comes to playing cover up. The Clinton administration excelled at cover-up ... no more.
I remember hearing: "Can he be charged with a crime which occured during his tenure after he leaves office?" It's why he cut a deal minutes before he left office. But if that deal was for the scope of only what was known at the time, maybe we'll still see him in jail.
Martha can cook for him and set the table with colors to match his eyes.
There's alot going on here we don't see. Wasn't bergler tied to los alamos labs? They just reported another theft the other day. He's kerry's "national security advisor"? Is there any info the chicoms are needing, yet?
No way.....won't happen. Sad, but true.
A 'Target' vs. a 'Subject'
What constitutes a "target" and a "subject" when it comes to a federal investigation?
Target
A "target" is a person who is likely to be indicted. The U.S. Attorneys' Manual defines a target as a "person as to whom the prosecutor or the grand jury has substantial evidence linking him or her to the commission of a crime and who, in the judgment of the prosecutor, is a putative defendant."
Subject
A "subject" of an investigation is a person whose conduct is within the scope of the grand jury's investigation, according to the manual. A subject may - or may not - ultimately become a target, legal experts say.
SOURCE: U.S. Attorneys' Manual
Wasn't this from October-- back when Dean was the odds-on favorite?
"Berger is stressing a willingness to cooperate"
I hope he avoids Fort Marcy Park.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.