Skip to comments.
Clinton aide took home classified 9-11 papers
WorldNetDaily.com ^
| Tuesday, July 20, 2004
Posted on 07/20/2004 12:32:28 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 next last
To: JohnHuang2
Berger and his lawyer told the news agency yesterday he knowingly removed handwritten notes he made while reading classified anti-terror documents at the archives by sticking them in his jacket and pants. They said he also inadvertently took copies of actual classified documents in a leather portfolio.
"I deeply regret the sloppiness involved, but I had no intention of withholding documents from the commission, and to the contrary, to my knowledge, every document requested by the commission from the Clinton administration was produced," Berger said in a statement to the AP.
Sloppiness? In his pants? Sure. I wonder what he's hiding in his cheeks.
21
posted on
07/20/2004 1:17:57 AM PDT
by
jaykay
To: jaykay
I'm refering to the cheeks on his face. Looks like a lot of room in there to hide those missing classified docs. Probably plenty of room in the other cheeks too though.
22
posted on
07/20/2004 1:20:17 AM PDT
by
jaykay
To: jaykay
I deeply regret the sloppiness involved, but I had no intention of withholding documents
Should read like this:
I deeply regret getting caught, but the American public could not see these documents. My dear friend, Mr Klintoon would have some splainin to do.
23
posted on
07/20/2004 1:32:05 AM PDT
by
conshack
To: JohnHuang2
Yep, the CIA isn't the problem. It's the smarmy slobs in the Clinton administration. It's all starting to come out in the wash.
24
posted on
07/20/2004 2:04:56 AM PDT
by
BigSkyFreeper
(While Bush plays "rope a dope", Kerry/Edwards play "grope a dope".)
To: jaykay
He looks like a squirrel collecting his winter stash of nuts.
25
posted on
07/20/2004 2:05:55 AM PDT
by
BigSkyFreeper
(While Bush plays "rope a dope", Kerry/Edwards play "grope a dope".)
To: JohnHuang2; conspiratoristo; dubyaismypresident; Pontiac; Commiewatcher; GOP_Lady; boxerblues; ...
FYI: democRATS in the news pings!
26
posted on
07/20/2004 2:08:27 AM PDT
by
Las Vegas Dave
("Let's roll" in 2004 ----- Vote GOP!)
To: Howlin; Miss Marple; Mo1; cyncooper; MJY1288
The Archives is believed to have copies of some of the missing documents.They know EXACTLY what papers are missing!
27
posted on
07/20/2004 2:53:03 AM PDT
by
Dog
To: JohnHuang2
...to my knowledge, every document requested by the commission from the Clinton administration was produced," Enogh of the Clintonian Horse Sh!t. How about you just return everything you stole, you little twerp!
28
posted on
07/20/2004 3:13:19 AM PDT
by
bondjamesbond
(Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown)
To: AuntB
Good point. Why would a former anyone no matter what their position still have access to classified material?
29
posted on
07/20/2004 3:18:59 AM PDT
by
Hillarys Gate Cult
("Read Hillary's hips. I never had sex with that woman.")
To: JohnHuang2
Breuer said Berger believed he was looking at copies of the classified documents, not originals.
Berger took handwritten notes on the classified papers, which his lawyer claims was "technical violation of Archive procedures, but it is not all clear to us this represents a violation of the law."
For classified documents, it is the INFORMATION CONTAINED that cause the documents to be classified. Every copy of classified documents is also classified and therefore every copy of a classified document is recorded and tracked.
Also, any material developed or created from a classified document is assumed to be classified at the same level as the original document or higher and therefore strict procedures must be followed to also classify the resulting work.
Mr. Berger's notes would be a derivative work and therefore also be controlled documents. Mr. Berger could not possible worked as national security advisor and not understand this.
The lawyer's comments about the notes being a "technicality" is pure smokescreen for the benefit of the liberal media.
If I were to do what Mr. Berger did, I would be fired from my job and very likely prosecuted.
30
posted on
07/20/2004 3:29:04 AM PDT
by
miner89
(Wherever you go, there you are)
To: miner89
A former top US gov't official resorted to stuffing secret documents down his pants, like some cheap crook shoplifting underwear at Wal-Mart.
The documents this Pantload put down his pants musta been extraordinarily incriminating to him and the Clintons. He was scared silly somebody would see what was in them, and was determined to remove them.
These are the desperate actions of a very, very worried individual on the verge of paranoia.
His admissions indicate they must have him doing the dastardly deed on tape, since he'd be unlikely to admit to the crime otherwise.
We need to keep our eyes open and our keyboards at the ready. Be aware that the Dims love playing the "victim" card. It's the only thing that makes the disturbed self-haters feel good about themselves. They are frantic to begin whining, and assuming the position
of "victim" ....to deflect blame and save their sorry rumps.
Watch Kerry start expresiing his "tolerance and compassion" for Pantload Berger.
May they all rot in an 8x8" cement cell.
31
posted on
07/20/2004 3:43:40 AM PDT
by
Liz
To: JohnHuang2
The Democratic Party is just filled with Dumb Asses!
To: Liz
There's not a "shred" of evidence!
33
posted on
07/20/2004 3:47:17 AM PDT
by
Twinkie
To: JohnHuang2
The Clinton Legacy Revealed
34
posted on
07/20/2004 3:49:36 AM PDT
by
Stallone
(Make love not war! ~ Lynndie England)
To: Twinkie
Democrats remain above the Law.
They maintain stolen documents and stolen FBI files ("badges of honor") for half a decade now.
Scumbag Burglar: "I inadvertantly stole and unintentionally destroyed the documents pertaining to US security
for a very important reason: To protect the myself, the Clintons and our "Mistress of Cover-Up" Gorelick. So what."
"WELCOME TO THE REAL AMERICA WHERE CRIMINALS GET TO BE
CELEBRITIES AND CELEBRITIES GET AWAY WITH MURDER."
"TO DIE FOR" Columbia Pictures
35
posted on
07/20/2004 3:52:59 AM PDT
by
Diogenesis
("Then I say unto you, send men to summon ... worms. And let us go to Fallujah to collect heads.")
To: JohnHuang2
Is it possible that this could be a smokescreen in order to get revisionist documents into the archives instead of destroying documents that show Sick Willy's culpability?
36
posted on
07/20/2004 3:53:40 AM PDT
by
Vesuvian
(Vorsprung durch Technik- It's an Audi Thing)
To: JohnHuang2
Let's get this straight: the former National Security Advisor stole classified documents relating to his administration's actions in response to terrorism by concealing them in his pants like a common shoplifter and the reaction by the press and the 9/11 Commission is virtually nonexistent?
Is anybody connecting the dots here? What is Berger trying to conceal?
37
posted on
07/20/2004 3:54:33 AM PDT
by
USMCVet
To: USMCVet
On Aug. 22, 1996, just before the Democratic National Convention,
Ms. Gorelick oversaw a critical Justice Department meeting with the FBI.
mmediately after this meeting, as it happened,
all serious inquiry into the fate of TWA 800 came to an end.
Gorelick was instrumental in the corruption of TWA Flight 800 terrorism investigation
Did Clinton appointee corrupt Flight 800 probe?
THE OBSTRUCTION OF THE OKLAHOMA BOMBING GRAND JURY INVESTIGATION,
The Mysterious Jamie Gorelick Phone Call
By David Hoffman,Sun Sep 14 12:10:57 1997
MORE?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1117579/posts
GORELICK GATE - various FR links
Consider: If Gorelick, Clarke and Clinton had been completely HONEST
to the American public about the Islamic-crashed airplanes, like TWA800, in the 90's
or the other Islamic terror attacks, then Americans WOULD have been on alert on 911
and would have had the opportunity to prevent the 911 Atrocities.
38
posted on
07/20/2004 3:59:27 AM PDT
by
Diogenesis
("Then I say unto you, send men to summon ... worms. And let us go to Fallujah to collect heads.")
To: 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub; LindaSOG; Radix; Kathy in Alaska; MoJo2001; LaDivaLoca; Fawnn; ...
Another X42 leftover who should be tried for 9/11 ping.
39
posted on
07/20/2004 4:48:10 AM PDT
by
Arrowhead1952
(Flush the john/john rat ticket in 2004. #1 & #4 liberals in Congress.)
To: miner89
Mr. Berger's notes would be a derivative work and therefore also be controlled documents. Mr. Berger could not possible worked as national security advisor and not understand this.
Do Berger's notes, as a derivative document, fall under the 1978 Public Documents Act? If so, they are the property of the US Government and not his personal property.
This is already being set up as a *technical violation* in that he *only* kept *his own* notes.
Also, he is piously claimong he gave the Commission all the documents they *requested*. He didn't give them the documents they were unaware of and therefore did not request.
40
posted on
07/20/2004 4:49:01 AM PDT
by
reformedliberal
(Proud Bush-Cheney04 volunteer)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson