Posted on 07/20/2004 12:11:21 AM PDT by ambrose
Since he is a left-wing democrat and is shielding Clinton nothing will happen to him. "It is just personal and should not be considered when going about his business" as the democrats say.
Berger was trying to hide documents that were embarrassing to him and to Clinton. It's as simple as that.
Serial documents are the key here.
"The New York Times has a Reuter story on this but nothing else. The whole issue seems front page and needing criminal prosecution. My guess is the Pubbies and this Administration will do nothing and, also, give the RATS a pass. This could be big news and a fatal blow to the Kerry campaign since Berger is one of his principal counselors."
And he was Clinton's boy. You make the connection yet?
calling Richard Ben Venista---calling Ben Venista.
Another one of yours needs your shilling cover up talents-or would go to jail.
Isn't it wonderful to know with friends like these you will never be out of work.
After all Jamie Gorelick is waiting in the wings too you know.
Let's look at what may really be going on here.
A few days ago John Kerry announced he intended to seek a new intelligence czar with cabinet rank. About two days after that the 9/11 commission releases some preliminary recommendations including -- you guessed it -- creating a new new intelligence czar with cabinet rank. Did John Kerry have advance knowledge of that recommendation? Probably.
Sandy Berger is an "adviser" to the John Kerry campaign. Kerry has been trying to gain traction with his claim that the Bush administration should have known about airport and port security and it was the fact that they did not improve security that led to 9/11 (conveniently ignoring the facts that the report was of litterally thousands which dated back to the Clinton administration.) Was Berger lifting classified documents for the Kerry campaign in a Watergate type operation? Before you say that's outrageous remember that John Kerry's brother and another individual were arrested in Kerry's first campaign for Congress for breaking into the headquarters of the other candidate. And what was John Kerry's response? He pioneered the defense later used by the mayor of Washington DC (Marion Berry) by claiming they were set up!
Fascinating info on skerry's brother - do you have a link? I'm certain it would have made front page news somewhere and would today. yeah right.
I'm sorry, but what does this have to do with Monica's dress?
" I'm sorry, but what does this have to do with Monica's dress?"
Hint to Clintonistas: "Keep it in your pants" isn't referring to top secret documents.
It's all about sex!
The New York Times: (212) 556-7652
The New York Post: (212) 930-8000
ABC: 212-456-7777
CBS: 212-975-4321
NBC: 212-664-4444
CNN: 404-237-0234
Fox:1-888-369-4762
NY York Daily News (212) 210-NEWS
This leaves May, June, and parts of Apriland July -- three months in all -- during which Berger knew he had been caught and was still a top Kerry advisor.
So the question is, what did Kerry know, and when did he know it? Why is this guy still part of the Kerry campaign?
...who BTW now has a thief (Berger) and a liar (Wilson) as advisors.
Bill O'Reily
E-mail: oreilly@foxnews.com
Sean Hannity
hannity@foxnews.com
Let's FREEP Alan Colmes while we're at it!
colmes@foxnews.com
Phylis Schlafly
eagle@eagleforum.org
Oliver North
http://www.northamerican.com/-cybercall/pg-call.htm
Janet Parshall, conservative talk show host
(703) 276-8597
Fax: (703) 516-7212
E-Mail us at: info@jpamerica.com
Brit Hume
Special Report with Brit Hume
Special@foxnews.com
Hugh Hewitt (conservative talk show host/columnist)
http://www.hughhewitt.com/
Michael Medved (conservative talk show host/columnist)
http://www.michaelmedved.com/contact.shtml
I've always thought that bergler was appointed on behalf of the chicoms.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.