Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Howlin

That's something I don't get -- Clinton was having Berger select which documents from the Administration to give the 9/11 Commission.

Why wasn't some "neutral" party reviewing the docs? Was this made public, that Clinton could have his own people select the documents to be seen by the Commission?


95 posted on 07/20/2004 12:25:02 AM PDT by GOPrincess
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]


To: GOPrincess

Well, the commission sure didn't allow the Bush Administration to be that selective, did they? There's a lot to this story I don't understand YET. I won't tolerate this one being buried. But I think I'm falling asleep.....night all!!


99 posted on 07/20/2004 12:31:03 AM PDT by AuntB ("You are entitled to your own opinion, but you’re not entitled to your own set of facts.’ R.Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

To: GOPrincess

I'm dying to know what that's all about too. He got to hand pick what documents the commission got to see?? I just don't get it.


105 posted on 07/20/2004 12:46:49 AM PDT by Tom_Busch (Reject communism, vote Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

To: GOPrincess; maica
Why wasn't some "neutral" party reviewing the docs?

On a TV interview, one of the commission members (It was either Keane or Leahy), in defending Gorelick's being on the commission, said that she had the skills and had done such a good job in selecting the documents that the commission should reivew. I gave up on that commission when I heard that.

141 posted on 07/20/2004 7:44:23 AM PDT by Freee-dame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson