Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Archaeologist Beleives Find Is Proof Of Lost Indian Culture (Freemont People)
Star Tribune ^ | 7-17-2004

Posted on 07/17/2004 10:36:08 AM PDT by blam

Archaeologist believes find is proof of lost Indian culture

By The Associated Press

BILLINGS, Mont. (AP) -- A government archaelogist believes ancient fire pits and pottery recently unearthed in south-central Montana are the works of an Indian culture that disappeared hundreds of years ago from its home range in modern-day Colorado and Utah.

Glade Hadden, a Bureau of Reclamation archaeologist, said evidence found at the site near Bridger strongly suggests the area was inhabited by Fremont people, an Indian culture known for its masonry work and fine pottery.

"There is no doubt in my mind," Hadden said.

His could be a controversial conclusion, but it could also provide a clue to determining what happened to the Fremont people, who are believed to have disappeared from their home range in the 14th century.

The Fremont people lived in what is now Utah and Colorado, mostly from about 300 A.D. to 1200 A.D.

"Then they disappeared," Hadden said. "I mean they flat disappeared. No one knows what happened to them."

Last month, while on an excavation south of Bridger, Hadden said he saw a piece of ancient earthenware that he immediately recognized.

"I knew right away that it was Fremont pottery," he said. "I grew up with Fremont pottery. I know what it looks like."

Working with students from Montana State University-Billings, Hadden also unearthed an intricate fire pit that further convinced him of the significance of the find.

The pit, about 20 inches deep and 2 feet wide, was expertly lined with a thin layer of sandstone slabs. The joints were plastered with mud and worked to a smooth surface, all identical to the work of Fremont people, said Hadden, whose wife was also involved in the excavation.

"We've dug a lot of fire pits over the years, but I've never seen anything like the amount of work that was put into this one," said Johanna Hadden, an assistant professor of education at MSU-Billings.

Hadden has yet to submit samples of the items found for tests that could determine their age. But he said the site appears to have been in use sometime between 1400 and 1600.

If his theory is correct that the site was inhabited by Fremont people, the question becomes: How and why did they end up moving so far north from their historic range?

Questions remain about whether the Fremont people were assimilated, annihilated or forced north by intruding people, Hadden said.

Hadden suspects a combination of environmental factors and aggressive newcomers may have resulted in a move north.

"We want to find out what kind of people were here and what were they doing," he said.

In Utah this spring, researchers announced they had found a well-preserved Fremont site on a former ranch. The Range Creek site, protected from intruders for 50 years by the rancher who owned it, reportedly contains large numbers of rock art sites, remote granaries in the rock wall and pit houses.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Montana
KEYWORDS: archaeologists; culture; freemont; godsgravesglyphs; indian; lost; people; proof
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: PoorMuttly
What fun is it to run off at the mouth if you actually know something?
21 posted on 07/19/2004 9:33:40 AM PDT by Publius6961 (I don't do diplomacy either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: PoorMuttly

Actually, there is a lot written about the dynamics of early tribal peoples, but most of appears to be supposition. But the general feeling that I get from the literature in the field is that the various tribal groups were not as isolated as we are generally led to believe. I remember visiting the Pueblo Grande museum some time ago and being shown evidence that the Hohokam peoples in the valley of the sun (phx metro area) traded quite regularly with the meso-americans. This sort of blew me away, because of the (then) controversial assertions by a few archaelogists some years ago that the Aztecs originated in New Mexico.


22 posted on 07/19/2004 9:34:54 AM PDT by Frumious Bandersnatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Frumious Bandersnatch

I learn so much here. It's great.

"What fun is it to run off at the mouth if you actually know something?"

I should try that sometime.

Nah....


23 posted on 07/19/2004 9:40:21 AM PDT by PoorMuttly ("I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: PoorMuttly

Fortunately I don't know if I know something or not....so it's always fun.

Most things I know I think I know, and who knows what I think anyway.


24 posted on 07/19/2004 6:54:14 PM PDT by PoorMuttly ("I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson