To: js1138
I'm with mom on this one. According to the article, Dad has full custody. I don't see why the mother should have any say in the matter.
5 posted on
07/16/2004 8:52:09 AM PDT by
malakhi
To: malakhi
Agreed. She should pay her child support and STFU.
To: malakhi
11 posted on
07/16/2004 8:56:34 AM PDT by
CzarNicky
(The problem with bad ideas is that they seemed like good ideas at the time.)
To: malakhi
According to the article, Dad has full custody. I don't see why the mother should have any say in the matter.thank you. You beat me to it actually. I was busy laughing at johniegrad's joke.
To: malakhi
"According to the article, Dad has full custody. I don't see why the mother should have any say in the matter."
I think dad ought to be careful here. The kid can always have it circumcised later if he wants, but there is no operation that can reverse a circumcision. Some men resent being circumcised. I side with mom on this one.
37 posted on
07/16/2004 9:17:38 AM PDT by
monday
To: malakhi
I have to side with mom here. Dad should have thought about this when he was born. She may not have custody but it doesnt mean she doesn't love him and she is still his mother and should be able to voice concerns. Unless a medical problem I agree with waiting now until he is old enough to understand and decide for himself.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson