To: milestogo
China delivers blunt warning to U.S.
Hey, PRC, just admit right up front that the current government in Taiwan is older than the PRC by a couple of decades, that the PRC has no legal claim to Taiwan, but that you lust after it and after one of the world's greatest art collections housed there, protected against the early Chinese communists' societal purge against anything "reactionary", ie, old. And then we'll tell you to put a sock in it or be prepared to take some ICBMs that'll wipe Beijing (and all your top military installations) off the map should you try to invade Taiwan.
44 posted on
07/16/2004 7:23:10 AM PDT by
aruanan
To: aruanan
Bush would likely approach that toughness as much as the puppet masters let him.
He would likely have to subtract out the nukes for Russia, Iran, Syria, Cuba, France (which I believe will be the European nation Dimitri Duduman 'saw' join Russia and China against us--though no one has said so and Duduman forgot which European nation it was), North Korea and some say--Japan.
Kerry, of course, would not no such pluck nor values. He'd be more likely to OFFER Hawaii.
64 posted on
07/16/2004 7:42:42 AM PDT by
Quix
(PRAYER WARRIORS, DO YOUR STUFF! LIVES, SOULS AND NATIONS DEPEND ON IT)
To: aruanan; Grampa Dave; ALOHA RONNIE; tallhappy; onyx; potlatch; ntnychik; MeekOneGOP; Smartass; ...
Hey, PRC, just admit right up front that the current government in Taiwan is older than the PRC by a couple of decades, that the PRC has no legal claim to Taiwan, but that you lust after it and after one of the world's greatest art collections housed there, protected against the early Chinese communists' societal purge against anything "reactionary", ie, old. And then we'll tell you to put a sock in it or be prepared to take some ICBMs that'll wipe Beijing (and all your top military installations) off the map should you try to invade Taiwan. Taiwan has been controlled from the mainland for thirteen years in three millenia: 1887-1895, 1945-1949.
The party of Sun Yat-sen predates that of Mouse Dung.
W said we would do what it takes to defend Taiwan.
And the W, as we know, doesn't stand for waffle.
The beetles of Beijing know this, too, as they are only effective in crushing unarmed student democracy advocates and harmless Christians, Falun Gong women, Tibetan Buddhist nuns.
They have caught their meat in Hong Kong--there is a hard knot of resistance to their oppression--do they dare Strike Hard?
After all, with the Olympics, et cetera, there is much at stake.
If they want to trade us Los Angeles for Beijing--hey, to be rid of Hollywood? Don't push it, Hu & Jiang, don't push it.
131 posted on
07/16/2004 11:07:01 PM PDT by
PhilDragoo
(Hitlery: das Butch von Buchenvald)
To: aruanan
That's China all over; the bull in the China-shop. Nothing elegant, subtle, nor diplomatic about those savages; just crash and boom.
China should not be telling the USA what to do; this is a losing proposition. China will hurt from this, and we will go on. I'd welcome dropping the chicom imports, and put our people to work manufacturing for ourselves. We do not need the chicoms; they need us.
And if it came to war, what a mistake that would be for them! We would whip them and be home in time for tea.
Chicoms: beware!
187 posted on
07/19/2004 5:35:56 PM PDT by
Constitution1st
(Never, never, never quit - Winston Churchill)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson