Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rokke
Ask them. Almost none of them claimed they saw a missile.

That's Clintonisque. Many eyewitnesses did not want to draw conclusions, they reported what they saw - but what many eyewitnesses described can be summrized by concluding that they saw a missile.

254 posted on 07/24/2004 7:21:17 AM PDT by GregoryFul (who ya gonna call?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies ]


To: GregoryFul
"but what many eyewitnesses described can be summrized by concluding that they saw a missile."

No, it can't. In fact, most are quoted as saying they thought it was a flare. Shoulder launched missiles leave a very distinctive corkscrew smoke trail. Larger missiles leave an even more obvious arcing smoke trail. It is all you usually see of the missile as the flame from the rocket motor is relatively small compared to the smoke trail it leaves. The smoke is exhaust from the rocket motor. When the motor burns out, there is no more smoke. Anyone who witnessed a "streak of light" with no smoke was not witnessing a missile.

255 posted on 07/24/2004 9:49:52 AM PDT by Rokke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson