Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

It's payback time, but who's paying?
Washington Times ^ | July 16, 2004 | Wesley Pruden

Posted on 07/16/2004 4:29:59 AM PDT by Elkiejg

Edited on 07/16/2004 7:20:41 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of the party, but that doesn't necessarily include all good women. You could ask Hillary Clinton.

Better yet, you could ask the mister. Whether you should necessarily believe him is a topic for another day. He's not under oath, after all.

Miss Hillary, no slouch as a pol in her own right, insists that she's not at all upset that John Kerry sent word that if she wants to attend the Democratic National Convention, opening in just over a week's time in Boston, she'll have to buy her own ticket. She will be relegated to a police line-up with several other prominent Democratic women, allowed to sit on the stage as long as she keeps quiet. (But no chador required.)

This is the kind of buzz Washington can't get enough of. The snub buzz emerged on a day when the Federal Marriage Amendment was derailed by the Senate, when an official but semi-hostile investigating panel cleared Tony Blair of misleading his government and his public about the reasons for going to war, and, to console the sleazy leftmost critics of George W. Bush, there was news of more blood and mayhem in Iraq. The implications of Monsieur Kerry's snubbing of Miss Hillary was nevertheless the buzz that drowned the tinkle of the ice cubes at the cool, dark places where Capitol Hill practices the rites of campaign summer.

When a radio interviewer in Binghampton asked Miss Hillary whether she was disappointed that Howard Dean and Teddy Kennedy were getting top billing and she wasn't getting any, she laughed the laugh that sounded a lot like the laugh when the boss tells a joke. "No," she said, of course she wasn't disappointed, not at all. "I've had many opportunities in the past."

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 4paragraphlimit; dncconvention; hillary; notanexcerpt; wesleypruden
Good one from Wes Pruden.
1 posted on 07/16/2004 4:29:59 AM PDT by Elkiejg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Elkiejg

b


2 posted on 07/16/2004 4:33:40 AM PDT by MoralSense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Elkiejg

I think he is a bit late. Didnt I read that yesterday babs Mikulski and the Dyke brigade got Hillary a speaking engagement?


3 posted on 07/16/2004 4:53:44 AM PDT by sgtbono2002 (I aint wrong, I aint sorry , and I am probably going to do it again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Elkiejg
...two Johns are necessary for the comfort and relief of the party...

Now that was funny and something tells me it was intentional!
4 posted on 07/16/2004 4:55:41 AM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Elkiejg
...it would require that the Clintons sacrifice their own interests, to put selfish concerns aside, to deny themselves, to think only of others. Hmmmmm.
I shoulda put the rest of it up. It's even funnier now that I think about it!
5 posted on 07/16/2004 4:58:14 AM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Elkiejg

To keep the hildabeast viable for 08 they have to make sure hanoi john looses.


6 posted on 07/16/2004 4:58:23 AM PDT by GailA (hanoi john kerry, I'm for the death penalty, before I impose a moratorium on it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Elkiejg

The funniest part to me is that when Kerry finally flipped and gave HC a "speaking part", what did he give her?

The opportunity to introduce her "errant" hubby.

Of course, she can't refuse, but what fun it must be to have to introduce your husband who's been cheating on you for years, and the whole world knows it, LOL!


7 posted on 07/16/2004 5:12:32 AM PDT by dawn53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dawn53

"This is the kind of buzz Washington can't get enough of. The snub buzz emerged on a day when the Federal Marriage Amendment was derailed by the Senate, when an official but semi-hostile investigating panel cleared Tony Blair of misleading his government and his public about the reasons for going to war, and, to console the sleazy leftmost critics of George W. Bush, there was news of more blood and mayhem in Iraq. The implications of Monsieur Kerry's snubbing of Miss Hillary was nevertheless the buzz that drowned the tinkle of the ice cubes at the cool, dark places where Capitol Hill practices the rites of campaign summer."

This is your answer. The RATS wanted to put into the background the Iraq/Niger tie that would clear Bush and make Wilson out to be a liar. The RATS were protecting their investment.

Hillary will speak. She was always going to speak. Just another diversion by the left.



8 posted on 07/16/2004 5:57:22 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Hitler? Stalin? The left has a tough decision as to who they would rather emulate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson