CIA's fumbles

Washington Times ^ | Friday, July 16, 2004 | By Terence P. Jeffrey

[JohnHuang2]

The Washington Times
www.washingtontimes.com

---

CIA's fumbles

By Terence P. Jeffrey
Published July 16, 2004

---

The Senate Select Intelligence Committee report on prewar U.S. intelligence in Iraq inspires two unexpected questions: (1) Why didn't more elected officials question the Central Intelligence Agency the way Vice President Dick Cheney did? (2) Did any politicians question the CIA enough?
    Americans have grown accustomed to the manifest excellence of our armed forces. When our elected leaders told them to take Iraq, they did it in a matter of weeks, with remarkably little collateral damage or loss of life. Government doesn't get any more efficient than the 3rd Infantry Division marching through sandstorms to Baghdad.
    But the Senate report depicts a CIA whose efficiency often resembled the U.S. Postal Service more than the U.S. Army.
    Mr. Cheney wouldn't take CIA reporting for granted. He peppered the agency with questions. Some Democrats would like to depict his inquisitiveness as an effort to pressure the agency to change its analysis to suit Mr. Cheney's foreign policy agenda. Truth is, more elected officials should have questioned the agency like Mr. Cheney did. He was a doubting Thomas who wanted to see for himself.
    The Senate report says Mr. Cheney visited the agency five to eight times between September 2001 and February 2003. To be sure, he brought his own mindset and asked questions directly of the analysts monitoring Iraq's weapons of mass destruction (WMD) programs. But he did not try to get these analysts to skew the evidence or their conclusions. Nor, according to the report, did any policymaker.