Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SJackson

I registered to respond to this. Carefully note that no assertion is made by Handgun Confiscation, Inc A/K/A Brady Center to Confiscate all Guns, that any of the people cited actually had a concealed carry permit.

And John Lott assures us that any discussion of the costs of some activity that excludes the benefits is a fraud, and this is a certifiable fraud because of that omission.

The benefits of concealed carry clearly outweigh the costs, the benefits of gun ownership clearly outweigh the costs.

And note well that since the 1995 federal gun ban in schools that one mass murder spree after another has taken place in our schools. When a perfect killing ground is created by law, it draws those to it with a murderous intent.

It is unlawful under Federal law, to take any weapons into a postal facility. These places of mass murder have created a new saying in the national lingo "going postal".

Anything coming from the mouth of a gun confiscation advocate is a deception, if not outright lie.


26 posted on 07/14/2004 5:26:58 PM PDT by Robert Taylor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: Robert Taylor
The benefits of concealed carry clearly outweigh the costs, the benefits of gun ownership clearly outweigh the costs.

Welcome to FR.

You're right, even from a perspective of one (not me) willling to cede to government the ability to control non-criminal gun ownership. Factor in the "benefits" of Freedom, there's nothing to discuss.

34 posted on 07/14/2004 5:32:15 PM PDT by SJackson (We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good, Hillary Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: Robert Taylor

Welcome to Free Republic.


53 posted on 07/14/2004 6:33:18 PM PDT by Flyer (I will never reference my tag line in my posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: Robert Taylor
It is unlawful under Federal law, to take any weapons into a postal facility

I don't think so. The law states that you can't carry there unless doing so under "lawful purposes", or something to that effect.

So if you are carrying "legally" outside, then you should be okay inside also.

62 posted on 07/14/2004 6:53:49 PM PDT by Mulder (To be born free is an accident,to live free is your duty,to die free is your obligation. Wm. Coulter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: Robert Taylor
I registered to respond to this.

Hello Robert Taylor and welcome to FR! I think the first time I registered, after lurking for some time was to respond to a gun control thread too.

When we were in DC for the Second Amendment Sisters rally this past Mother's Day, the commie mommies were staying in the same hotel as we were. We got into some serious discussion with a couple of them on Saturday night before the rally and I asked one of them: "I've lived my entire life and never broken a single law, save a couple of traffic tickets. Tell me why I should not be allowed to carry a gun to protect myself." Her response was that I *should* be able to carry.

They don't even know what they believe. It depends on who they are talking to at the time and their nature is such that whatever they hear must be true.

66 posted on 07/14/2004 7:32:44 PM PDT by PistolPaknMama (www.cantheban.net --Can the "assault" weapons ban!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson