To: river rat
Senator Roberts should have refused to release ANY report until the Democrats signed on to the enlargement that Wilson LIED INTENTIONALY as he was most likely coached to do by Democrat members of the credibility challenged 9-11 commission..Wouldn't that mean we wouldn't have learned about the documentation that supports what we had deduced? We've been vindicated here and it is a matter of record. That the dems want to ignore truth is nothing new. We'd be waiting forever to learn about this if Roberts did as you suggest.
Yes, Roberts and others could have spoken out but big deal. Off into the ether it would have gone. Committing pen to paper as has been done is much more helpful for truth and posterity.
22 posted on
07/14/2004 3:41:15 PM PDT by
cyncooper
("We will fear no evil...And we will prevail")
To: cyncooper
Think how much MORE attention it would have received in the lame stream media - if the entire report was being held in "conference" until the Democrats acknowledged the UNDENIABLE...
The FACTS of the lying weasel Mr. Wilson would have received a hell of a lot wider distribution and explanation -- and the Democrats partisan position exposed if this point had been driven into their dark hearts like a stake...
Sooner or later -- the Democrats MUST feel the consequences of their duplicitous and deceitful behavior...
They are one with the enemy.....they bring nothing but disruption to the Republic....I believe we must face them now -- NOT later..
Semper Fi
33 posted on
07/14/2004 4:57:57 PM PDT by
river rat
(You may turn the other cheek...But I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson