Yeah...but at least political speech is safe, right?
Are you kidding?......
Consider this example.
In FL homosexuals are prohibited from adopting children.
They have lost twice at the state SC and once at the federal level before the 11th with the USSC denying review.
The homosexuals are now left to try and get the all republican legislature to change the law. In fact the head of the family law section of the florida bar said she would be working for that. (florida attorneys can't make money from a homosexual partner's adoption of a natural offspring or hijack children from foster care based adoptions.)
A constitutional amendment will put the public policy and the legislative intent solidly discouraging homosexuality. Its absense now is to the advantage of the anti-family crowd because they can point to its absence.
The courts have failed because the ONLY source of lawyers for staffing the courts is leftist law schools with leftist law professors. All the gate keepers for judges are leftist based, ABA ATLA etc.
In short better to have an not need, than need and not have.