"black robed rulers..."
Where the constitution doesn't say, the judges have to interpret based upon what's already there. There's nothing in the constitution that says marriage is between a man and a woman. Granted, there's also nothing that says marriage is between a man and a horse. So here you have millions of people denied what they perceive as rights for no constitutionally mandated reason. What's a judge to do?
Does the U.S. Constitution have any theological, philosophical, historical contexts and foundations, or did it come into existence out of nothing?