Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Phantom Lord

Nothing like attempting to support a thesis of what is illegal porn, based on the legal opinion of an attorney general back 20 years ago...

by the way... I was unaware that AG opinions, and that of "panels" put together to espouse a certain legal view, is the equivalent of thirty years of Stare Decisis on free speech by the Supreme Court of the USA... Stare Decisis means something. We will never go back legally on certain issues.

the "sky is falling, because I saw a nekkid woman" cult... is over reaching with stuff like this.

THIS is a conservative website, that believes in SMALLER government... not the promotion of various degrees of a theocratic state.

We can believe in God as conservatives, but one cannot insist USING the state AS the means of enforcing THEIR peculiar view of God's will on their fellow man... and remain one.


503 posted on 07/14/2004 2:58:11 PM PDT by Robert_Paulson2 (the madridification of our election is now officially underway.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Robert_Paulson2

I suspect you are posting to the wrong person. Am I right? And if not, please explain how your post to me squares with anything I have posted on this thread.


505 posted on 07/14/2004 2:59:42 PM PDT by Phantom Lord (Distributor of Pain, Your Loss Becomes My Gain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 503 | View Replies ]

To: Robert_Paulson2
Stare Decisis means something. We will never go back legally on certain issues.

SCOTUS has reversed itself in the past and can do so again when it's clear that it's worked itself into an untenable position.

554 posted on 07/14/2004 3:33:25 PM PDT by inquest (Judges are given the power to decide cases, not to decide law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 503 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson