I suspect you are posting to the wrong person. Am I right? And if not, please explain how your post to me squares with anything I have posted on this thread.
I was attempting to agree with your post 11.
I additionally added my thougts that using a 20 year old panel report by an attorney general NOT in offced to define and restrict "free speech" was a pathetic premise.
If I misunderstood your disagreement with the thesis in general... sorry... Can I assume you agree with the article that was posted then?
or did I understand properly that you generally disagree and that you thought the original poster is asking for a good smackdown again... as you perhaps intimated in your post 11?