[robertpaulsen]

"Yet twice in your response to my answer you refer to non-kiddie porn."

Yes, because it is my contention that these producers of previously illegal porn will switch to kiddie porn, which could be 16 and 17-year-olds by your definition.

You deny that this would happen. Fine, you're entitled to your opinion. I just don't believe it, that's all.

Probably someone just like you said during prohibition that if we would just legalize alcohol, all the gangs and drive-by shootings would go away.

[Phantom Lord]

Yes, because it is my contention that these producers of previously illegal porn will switch to kiddie porn, which could be 16 and 17-year-olds by your definition.

16 or 17 as kiddy is not my definition (though I did say the age of 18 earlier), it is the legal age as defined by current law.

Those currently producing non kiddy porn would not switch to kiddy porn. They would continue with what they are making as there is a HUGE demand for it. No need to switch to a product with less demand, and far harsher legal penalties.

[tpaine]

Probably someone just like you said during prohibition that if we would just legalize alcohol, all the gangs and drive-by shootings would go away.
160 -rp-

______________________________________


Guess what paulsen. When the 18th was repealed, all the booze related turf wars did "go away".

Lordy - are you dense.