Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: robertpaulsen
Yes, because it is my contention that these producers of previously illegal porn will switch to kiddie porn, which could be 16 and 17-year-olds by your definition.

16 or 17 as kiddy is not my definition (though I did say the age of 18 earlier), it is the legal age as defined by current law.

Those currently producing non kiddy porn would not switch to kiddy porn. They would continue with what they are making as there is a HUGE demand for it. No need to switch to a product with less demand, and far harsher legal penalties.

169 posted on 07/14/2004 9:44:29 AM PDT by Phantom Lord (Distributor of Pain, Your Loss Becomes My Gain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies ]


To: Phantom Lord
"They would continue with what they are making as there is a HUGE demand for it."

You say that most porn is already legal. Well, yeah, kinda. Not legal like milk is legal, though.

If porn moves from the adult bookstore at $69.95 per video to the local 7-11 at $14.95 per video, porn producers will be looking to invest in any remaining high profit (illegal) business.

In my opinion.

248 posted on 07/14/2004 10:35:41 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson