[vanmorrison]

My thoughts after reading the exchange between Couric and Edwards were along the lines of "what a bitch". Her comments were catty and sarcastic, not intended to shed any light on any issues, just kicking up more tabloid dirt. That's all these people are about anymore. I think Bush's strategy of avoiding these jerks, like the NAACP, is the most sane and sensible approach. Why participate in letting these people Mau-Mau you, even if you're a Democrat? Why watch?

[governsleastgovernsbest]

Why watch?

A combo of masochism, Today's continuing ability to attract top guests, and the belief that it's worthwhile to keep track of the liberal media's doings.

[Robert A Cook PE]

respectfully disagree.

Couric fed him questions, true: But the vast-left-wing-majority of her questions were directly from previous dnc lies and exaggerations. And, of course, all of Edwards replies fed right back to the same playbook.

Bush was governor of FL, Kerry's Vietnam record, father was a mill worker, Cheney is a liar/jerk/foul-mouthed/rich/out-of-touch....

Couric never seriously challenged him. And, when Edwards replied with lies, she ignored them.