Skip to comments.
Red Hat restates earnings [oopsie!]
ZDNet ^
| July 13, 2004
| Dawn Kawamoto
Posted on 07/13/2004 9:12:02 AM PDT by mikegi
Red Hat announced Tuesday it is restating earnings going back to 2002, as the company changes the way it accounts for subscription revenue.
The Linux company, which recently reported the resignation of its chief financial officer, said it made the decision to change its revenue recognition after discussions last month with its independent auditors, PricewaterhouseCoopers.
(Excerpt) Read more at zdnet.com.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: accounting; irregularities; linux; redhat
Hmmm, resignation of CFO followed by restatement of years of "earnings". Stock is down 21%.
1
posted on
07/13/2004 9:12:02 AM PDT
by
mikegi
To: mikegi
The stock is down by 4+ points, with 34 m shares trading. A lot of shorts out today!
2
posted on
07/13/2004 9:23:27 AM PDT
by
NavySEAL F-16
("proud to be a Reagan Republican")
To: mikegi
Check out Mirant (mirkq). Also, Harken (hec). One penny stock is as good as another :-D.
3
posted on
07/13/2004 9:25:50 AM PDT
by
MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
(Freedom is the freedom to discipline yourself so others don't have to do it for you.)
To: mikegi
This isnt' that big a deal.
Red Hat, which announced its first quarter results last month, now expects to revise its revenue to a range of $41.2 million to $41.7 million. The company had previously reported first quarter revenue of $41.6 million.
The company's first quarter net income, meanwhile, is expected to range between $10.3 million and $10.7 million. Previously, the company announced first quarter net income of $10.7 million.
For fiscal 2004, the company expects to restate its revenue somewhere between $123.8 million and $124.8 million, compared with its previously reported $126.1 million. Red Hat is also lowering its net income to a range of $13.2 million to $13.7 million. The company previously announced its net income would reach $14 million.
Red Hat also expects to lower its fiscal 2003 revenue to around $89.7 million to $90.3 million, compared with its previously announced $90.9 million. And the company's net loss for the year is now expected to be in the range of $6.9 million to $7.2 million, compared to the previously stated loss of $6.6 million.
4
posted on
07/13/2004 9:32:10 AM PDT
by
adam_az
(Call your State Republican Party office and VOLUNTEER!!!!)
To: adam_az
Musta been a bad cpu chip....
5
posted on
07/13/2004 9:42:31 AM PDT
by
theDentist
("John Kerry changes positions more often than a Nevada prostitute.")
To: adam_az
I've learned never argue with the trend. And, this trend is going down! The market is never wrong.
Just take a look at the P/E. It's always been a spec stock and some people won big and some lost even bigger.
6
posted on
07/13/2004 1:12:50 PM PDT
by
NavySEAL F-16
("proud to be a Reagan Republican")
To: mikegi
The supposed prime example of open source commercial viability looks like nothing but a house of cards. The SEC investigation will hopefully be deep, as it should be of anyone pushing a new "service only" model for the US software industry, while possibly cooking their books in the back room.
To: Golden Eagle
Yea this is aweful oh it only they were a
Closed source Company there is no way they would ever have to restate their earnings..
8
posted on
07/16/2004 7:57:24 AM PDT
by
N3WBI3
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson