Govm't has no right to define what is marriage whatsoever. The must recognize what the culture determines marriage is. Regardless of the various particulars found about why it is so, marriage is universally a contract between a man and a woman. That is what govm't must accept. If they don't, then any govm't action contrary to that is illegitimate. Govm't is also not an arbitor hear, nor does it have the right to do so. It must simply render itself an observer and report what it finds. ie. marriage is a contract between a man and a woman.
So when it determines that people can marry in the same sex or to their animals,,it will be OK?
Govm't has no right to define what is fraud whatsoever. The must recognize what the culture determines fraud is.