Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: presidio9
What's being "protected" is the government monopoly on the recognition of marriages.

My wife and I watched The Patriot again on July 4, and noticed that the pastor solemnizing the marriage of Gabriel Martin and Anne Howard did not say "by the power vested in me by the Colony of South Carolina..."

5 posted on 07/13/2004 8:23:57 AM PDT by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: mvpel

More of the libertarian "get government out of marriage" nonsense.

In a world where anti-social behavior was restrained by fear of disgrace, by fear of ostracism, by fear of "what the neighbors will say" civil society did not need the state to define marriage. We no longer live in such a world. We no longer live in a world where reputations last a lifetime and people spend all their lives in one place. Government defines the duties of marriage because society has no power to force men to shoulder familial obligations they have grown weary of. Government defines the duties of marriage because it has a societal interest in protecting women and children.


11 posted on 07/13/2004 8:43:13 AM PDT by Sam the Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: mvpel
Exactly.

The true libertarian position with regard to this issue is not that "gay marriage" should be legally recognized by the state, but that the state has no business recognizing ANY marriages whatsoever.

12 posted on 07/13/2004 8:48:53 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Ego numquam pronunciare mendacium . . . sed ego sum homo indomitus")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson