Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lugsoul

Actually the FMA would preserve federalism by leaving the issue of civil unions up to the state legislature. I can't think of anything more pro-state's rights. But to hear the Democrats talk, to trust the representatives of the people is to slide down into despotism.


136 posted on 07/12/2004 11:36:58 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies ]


To: goldstategop

"Actually the FMA would preserve federalism by leaving the issue of civil unions up to the state legislature."

YES.


142 posted on 07/12/2004 11:40:06 AM PDT by Bahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]

To: goldstategop
That's a good answer, except that it contradicts the very language of the amendment. The amendment would prohibit any state constitution from being construed to grant the "legal incidents" of marriage to a homosexual couple. So that if, for example, the Hawaii constitution required that same sex "civil unions" receive all of the legal benefits of marriage, the FMA would prohibit such a construction.
145 posted on 07/12/2004 11:41:19 AM PDT by lugsoul (Until at last I threw down my enemy and smote his ruin on the mountainside.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson