[Spunky]

"Have you listened to this interview of Justin Falconer, the radio hosts kind of got on him a little bit to say the least."

I just listened. John and Ken sure had him going.

Justin thinks you maintain that "Innocent" until proven guiltly clear to the end of the trial and then when you go into deliberations is when you begin forming an opinion. I would hate to be on a jury with him. Not only would the trial take 4 months but so would the deliberations.

He did say he would like to hear more about the missing anchors. I think we all would.

[Devil_Anse]

I think the concept of circumstantial evidence--easily mastered by countless jurors across the whole country--is too much for Justin.

HEY, JUSTIN! HOW DO YOU KNOW YOUR MOM IS REALLY YOUR MOM? YOU WEREN'T THERE RIGHT BEFORE YOU WERE CONCEIVED, WERE YOU? YOU DIDN'T SEE YOUR CONCEPTION WITH YOU OWN EYES, DID YOU? WHERE'S YOUR PROOF?

HEY, JUSTIN! DID YOU KNOW THAT BLOOD IS ACTUALLY BLUE WHEN IT'S IN YOUR VEINS AND ARTERIES? IT ONLY TURNS RED WHEN IT COMES INTO CONTACT WITH AIR!

[Reaganwuzthebest]

Justin thinks you maintain that "Innocent" until proven guiltly clear to the end of the trial and then when you go into deliberations is when you begin forming an opinion.

After listening to that interview my impression was it would have taken more than circumstantial evidence to convince him of Peterson's guilt. So it looks like the defense lost one for their side.

[Canadian Outrage]

Justin needs a message. It no longer matters about anchors or anything in this trial Justin because you got your arse booted off the Jury.