Some Key Conservatives Uneasy About Bush

The Herald (Miami) ^ | Jul. 11, 2004 | SCOTT LINDLAW

[Military Chick]

I know Military Chick personally. She's my wife. She's posted on FR under other names in the past, in fact for several years. She decided to chose a new name to post under recently (you'll have to ask her why).

It is nice to have a man stand up for his wifes honor. Indeed I did post under my first initial and maiden name. When we married I decided to post under my married name. I chose this because franky I do not like posting on something that hides a person. At the time my husband was uncomfortable with using our name that I did change it.

Again why go off topic?

[catpuppy]

... an unrepentent ambulance chaser

Life ain't easy for a boy named "sue."

[meema]

bump to read later

[Dane]

It's not a secret, I simply didn't know. Now I do, because I asked since I originally posted.

Uh chick you can always state your old multiple screen names in the tag line, if you wish.

[Torie]

Don't let them get you down. You're getting a bum rap. All you did was post the freaking article. I think later you indicated that you did not agree with it. That was smart, because the article collapsed of its own weight, to the enjoyment of so many of us.

[Mark in the Old South]

Re: "Do those "rock solid Conservatives " support the war now that we are in it?"

I don't know. But then I don't know what you mean by support the war. I don't consider someone who muses over coffee "We should never have gotten in this war" as an active obstacle to the war effort.

What have you done to support the war? Other than attend a pro-Bush, pro-war rally before the war started I can't say I've done much myself. As a result I am not about to jump someone for holding a different POV.

[Dane]

Don't let them get you down. You're getting a bum rap. All you did was post the freaking article

And her intial comment was "Voices that perhaps need to be heard?".

Sorry torie and MC, but if you all don't know by now that the AP gives voices that want to destroy this country the biggest megaphone in their commentary articles, then you will never learn.

Sheesh when posting an AP comentary article a requiste "barf alert" is mandatory, IMO.

[Mark in the Old South]

Re: "The Constitution Party and other unappeaseable conservatives are promoting urban legends that say Roe vs. Wade and other unlikeable Supreme Court decisions can be overturned by mere excutive orders by the President."

Well you are not quite right on this one. The best solution is impeachment of a Justice. What is an impeachable offense is determined by Congress, but we all know that is not going to happen. So another option has to be considered. There are past instances where a Pres. ignored a ruling. It is risky but it has been done. Lincoln did it but I remember in school learning about one case in the 20th century where the Pres. ignored a high court ruling. I wish i could remember the issue or the Pres. We have lots of Hx buffs here maybe someone else has a better memory.

[WOSG]

Thanks.

Let me now correct a few typos that distorted my meaning in the post:

"This neo-isolationist totally distorted the real Reagan record of supporting freedom fighters world-wide and Reagan's pro-active anti-Communist work from supporting Polish unions to deploying intermediate missiles, and missed the *whole* point here: G W Bush is fighting the war on terror the way Reagan fought the Communists, To Win.

Isolationists like Pat B. *can't* see that. And Liberals and the French *can't* stand the idea of American victory. So they are apoplectic, as were the anti-antiCommunists in the 1980s over Reagan's boldness."

[Military Chick]

Give Military Chick the TROPHY !!

Thank you, thought about making up some stickers. But, really don't wanna muck up my vehicle with the liks of John, John!

[WOSG]

All true.

But it is ALSO true that the Democrat Party each year slips further into the abyss of Socialist claptrap, treason, and advocating the destruction of our core values, beliefs and institutions (like the family, military etc).

Do we want to break up a party? Yes we do: The DEMOCRATS.

We are on an historical threshold. If the Republicans fall to the Democrats, it is all over: THE DEMOCRATS WANT TO RECREATE CANADA AND FRANCE HERE.

1. Fight Conservative fights in the GOP to win friends and influence people.
2. Unite the Right to get behind the GOP in November elections.

[Mark in the Old South]

You have been taking too many history courses taught by liberal professors. Dresden was a strategic industrial city, it was a legitimate target of the war effort. We did not have the pinpoint targeting of our bombers then.

It is a pitty but Dresden was not bombed because it had people only.

[gatorbait]

What's more amazing is that you seem to skip over each and every refutation of the latest "we hate Bush" bromide. You do not seem to have a handle on how Federal Judges and Justices are appointed and the terms of their appointments, nor do you cite a credible source on the World Court, nor have you cited where anyone of the 'true and principled' have gotten it dead to rights.

When you can do that without citing Michael Savage, or one of the clowder here, I might take your opinions more seriously.Presently,I find them bereft of intellectual honesty.

[F.J. Mitchell]

Key Conservatives, my ass! Is "KEY" a code name for RINO's?

Kookier
Every
Year

Yep! that's RINO's!

[Mark in the Old South]

Go back and read my entire post you are quoting.

[Torie]

Just how would Bush implement his ignoring of a SCOTUS ruling, and implement it? Of course if Bush did that, beyond the enforcement apparatus ignoring his illegal orders, he would and should be impeached and convicted.

Taking this absurdity further, suppose Bush said, I hereby declare Roe v Wade null and void. Assuming he is not taken away in a strait jacket, then what? OK, so Idaho passes a law prohibiting abortion, and arrests somebody getting an abortion. The federal court issues a writ of habeas corpus. Bush somehow takes custody, and ignores that order. Splendid.

I think you are a bit of a nutter. You are, aren't you?

[Dane]

Go back and read my entire post you are quoting

I did and it read like that you were giving the benefit of the doubt to Wiener(Savage) in your reply #147, thus my reply #179.

[dasein64]

I am a key conservative and I support Bush/Cheney. Lots of us key conservative out here in fly over country. My vote counts as much as the self important Belt Way guys. How about that---

[Torie]

No, it was bombed when Germany was on its last legs, and was not bombed to take out factories no longer doing much, or relevant to anything. (If they really wanted to take out factories, they should have firebombed Essen.) It was bombed because Churchill wanted payback for the bombing of London.

[Deb]

What an asswipe. I knew he had to be a Richard Korb-type Reagan guy when he wrote "neoconservatives". A dead give-away we have a phony Republican lecturing us. Great find.