British government employees have way too much time on their hands and free access to hallucinatory medications.
1 posted on
07/10/2004 10:59:33 PM PDT by
ijcr
To: MadIvan
2 posted on
07/10/2004 11:01:35 PM PDT by
Fiddlstix
(This Tagline for sale. (Presented by TagLines R US))
To: ijcr; MadIvan
It did not say it was the british government, it might be the EU government for all we know. =o)
Humbug!!! (is that slander?)
3 posted on
07/10/2004 11:02:45 PM PDT by
GeronL
(wketchup.com)
To: ijcr
This is satire from The Onion right? I can't imagine they'd be that stupid in the U.K.
5 posted on
07/10/2004 11:03:08 PM PDT by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: ijcr
It is fitting and correct that peta and it's supporters should want to extend these "humanitarian rights" to other members of their family groups. How can you be so cruel as too disallow them free discourse and association with their ilk.
This is the type of legislation for which "sunshine laws" were enacted. The proponents should be placed under a magnifying lens, in order to discern their true intent. Yes! Let the light shine upon them.
And if? They find a saucer of beer to slake their thirst, perhaps a little shaker of salt will add a tang to their squirming.
6 posted on
07/10/2004 11:20:33 PM PDT by
rock58seg
(Communists and liberals read Marx and Lenin, Conservatives understand them. BUSH/CHENEY 04)
To: ijcr; MadIvan
Have the surviving members of the Monty Python team executed a coup d'etat over there or something?
No, they can't have. This is way beyond silly.
8 posted on
07/10/2004 11:37:40 PM PDT by
KangarooJacqui
(Advice to Kerry/Edwards: "Stop that, it's silly.")
To: ijcr
Then surely this would apply to a fetus...
To: ijcr
A spokesman for Peta... has welcomed the proposals, saying: "Compassion must be extended to all living beings. Stamping on a slug sets an example to children that 'might makes right'." There they go again, imanentizing the eschaton....
14 posted on
07/11/2004 2:50:45 AM PDT by
Grut
To: ijcr
This liberal crap is becoming way to crazy.
16 posted on
07/11/2004 3:42:58 AM PDT by
garylmoore
(Looking forward to the day when I can chat with Him.)
To: ijcr
If insects and molluscs are to be afforded the law's protection, there will be little argument for excluding bivalves. How prophetic were the words of the philosopher Bertrand Russell, who so long ago warned that: "Animal rights, taken to their logical conclusion, mean votes for oysters."Of course those rights must be extended to bivalves! After all, when you shuck an oyster, you're breaking into its home to eat it! How's that for a personal rights violation!
Mark
18 posted on
07/11/2004 4:14:41 AM PDT by
MarkL
(The meek shall inherit the earth... But usually in plots 6' x 3' x 6' deep...)
To: Bonaparte
Ping to a fleafight slugfest.
Couldn't let you miss this after the bullfight thread. :)
20 posted on
07/11/2004 4:39:33 AM PDT by
Free Trapper
(Because we ate the green mammals first!)
To: ninenot; sittnick; steve50; Hegemony Cricket; Willie Green; Wolfie; ex-snook; FITZ; arete; ...
Lice and mosquitoes bump.
30 posted on
07/11/2004 9:00:40 AM PDT by
A. Pole
(Capt. Lionel Mandrake: "Condition Red, sir, yes, jolly good idea. That keeps the men on their toes.")
To: ijcr
First off, I utterly and completely reject the argument that dying of beer is "painful."
31 posted on
07/11/2004 11:16:00 AM PDT by
ninenot
(Minister of Membership, TomasTorquemadaGentlemen'sClub)
To: ijcr
Even I know while there are such things as legal fleas, there is no such thing as a flea lunch.
(So how do they network? You tell me.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson