Skip to comments.
President Bush to Appear on Larry King, Monday?
CNN ^
| July 9, 2004
Posted on 07/09/2004 11:05:49 PM PDT by RWR8189
KING: If you missed the interview with Senator and Mrs. Kerry last night, we'll repeat it tomorrow night. And Monday night, we have very special guests. We can't announce it until very early Monday morning or Sunday night after midnight Eastern time, but stay tuned for that. It's a very important guest on Monday.
That's what it sounds like to me. I've seen speculation to this effect on other blogs as well.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
TOPICS: Announcements; Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bc04; bush43; bushinterview; cnn; gwb2004; interview; king; larryking
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
To: BigSkyFreeper
Or Connie "Shhh, I have a secret" Chung. I can't stand Larry The Lizard King. When he has female guests on, I always anticipate his tongue will fall off its roller.
He is creepy looking.
21
posted on
07/10/2004 12:03:19 AM PDT
by
Jaysun
(You can fool some of the people some of the time and that’s usually sufficient for Democrats.)
To: RWR8189
I haven't watched Larry, or for that matter CNN for several years, since our cable started offering Fox News at least.
Me too.
22
posted on
07/10/2004 12:04:32 AM PDT
by
Jaysun
(You can fool some of the people some of the time and that’s usually sufficient for Democrats.)
To: the_Watchman
King had Pat Sajak on last year and had the audacity to ask him if Pat was concerned whether his conservative stance might negatively effect his viewership. King had had Steisand on within the month and the same question never came up.
That answers the question as to whether or not he's biased. He's just another neurotic activist dressed up like a reporter.
23
posted on
07/10/2004 12:09:38 AM PDT
by
Jaysun
(You can fool some of the people some of the time and that’s usually sufficient for Democrats.)
To: RWR8189
I wonder if the b@$+@rd King will facilitate an ambush on Dub-Yah like he did George, Sr., with Stephanopoulos? Who should we expect the breakthrough caller to be this time ... Mary Beth?
24
posted on
07/10/2004 12:10:00 AM PDT
by
JRPerry
("What You Think About You Do ... What You Do You Become.")
To: streetpreacher
oh, you're gooooooood!
ditto:)
To: RWR8189
I hope it isn't Bush because it will just look like Bush chasing behind Kerry.
To: Jaysun
I don't watch King - his suspenders put me off, but I would agree that he does not seem to have a political axe to grind. My only observation is that regardless of whether he has a Republican or Democrat on, he throws them both softballs and really doesn't follow up on any answers but takes them at face value and moves on. This has always been his modus operandi and it is what has made him what he is today.
His first big break came in radio when he was about the only talk show host who could consistently get Frank Sinatra on the air. Sinatra felt comfortable with King because he never tried to question him about matters that Sinatra felt were personal, ie; the mob, the babes, the tantrums, etc. Through Sinatra, King gained a reputation of being able to land the big interview which led him to CNN and the rest is history. However, to this day, King hasn't changed the interview style that made him successful in the first place.
To: Rokurota
it will be the kids that speak through john edwards......king loves that stuff
To: BigSkyFreeper; nopardons
Probably a criminal. Ken Lay, Martha Stewart, Micheal Jackson, Saddam Hussein.... They may be indeed guilty, but neither Ken Lay nor Michael Jackson have been found "guilty" in a court of law.
In the U.S., accused people are innocent until proven guilty.
29
posted on
07/11/2004 4:14:04 AM PDT
by
Theo
(homeschooling: small class sizes, effective discipline, healthy socialization, family values ...)
To: RWR8189
Michael Jackson?
Martha Stewart?
To: Cableguy
We watched a few minutes of this show while changing channels. We laughed our heads off.
First she asks about the initials
Then she has to ask if it is female or male
Then she has to ask if they are dead
Then she follows it up with their spirit is around the caller.
She should be the one telling the caller all t his information. We turned it off after looking at each other and saying... HUH?
31
posted on
07/11/2004 4:33:59 PM PDT
by
cubreporter
(I trust Rush...he will prevail in spite of the naysayers)
My guess was Nancy for Monday night, maybe from her home?
Char the Charlatan avoided the Biblical requirements of 100% accuracy for prophets. When she'd guess and the person would say 'no', guess again and a 'no' again, then say the person wasn't "focusing," "there's something here where we're not connecting, sorry", and hang up on them.
Basically, ask the person to be open to ANYone living or dead they know, then ask if they have a J in the name. Then male or female. Then add a vowel, then guess a popular name, Joe, Jane. Then was she a sister? a wife? "She/He's around you now." And that was it. It was ridiculously stupid. I was just hoping Nancy won't consider getting in touch with her!
To: gentlestrength
Ron Reagan, Jr. since it was announced that he will speak at the dem convention on stem cell research?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson