Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Microsoft Faces Angry IE Users' Questions
internetnews ^ | 7-9-2004 | Sean Michael Kerner

Posted on 07/09/2004 9:44:27 AM PDT by N3WBI3

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

1 posted on 07/09/2004 9:44:28 AM PDT by N3WBI3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: N3WBI3
"That means it's not completed, final or stable yet, and that the final stable SP2 is coming soon."

Neither is the Windows operating system, but that never stopped them from releasing it. :-)
2 posted on 07/09/2004 9:48:12 AM PDT by NJ_gent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: N3WBI3

Well, they sound fairly professional--though I'm sure a guy from the PR department was sitting next to them to "help" with their answers.

It's too bad IE doesn't offer much and version releases are so few and far in between.


3 posted on 07/09/2004 9:51:41 AM PDT by Terpfen (James Lileks: "A single death... is a tragedy. A million deaths is a U.N. committee report.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NJ_gent
MS must pay their IE engineers a ton because if one were to quit, no new SW Engineer would have a chance deciphering the IE spaghetti code.
4 posted on 07/09/2004 9:56:06 AM PDT by mlbford2 (Sorry for spelling errors, I'm a product of a state university)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mlbford2
"deciphering the IE spaghetti code."

I cannot even begin to imagine how horrid it must be at this point. The price for integration and backwards compatability - Microsoft-style - is garbage code doing garbage work.

Microsoft would do well to hire up all the folks on the Mozilla project and simply pay them to continue doing what they're doing, then replace the default web browser in Windows with Firefox.
5 posted on 07/09/2004 10:02:35 AM PDT by NJ_gent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mlbford2
MS must pay their IE engineers a ton because if one were to quit, no new SW Engineer would have a chance deciphering the IE spaghetti code.

When was the last time you looked at IE code?
6 posted on 07/09/2004 10:11:11 AM PDT by Bush2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NJ_gent
Microsoft would do well to hire up all the folks on the Mozilla project and simply pay them to continue doing what they're doing, then replace the default web browser in Windows with Firefox.

Grrrrrrrrrreat. Then, Microsoft could replace one critical vulnerability with another... /SARCASM
7 posted on 07/09/2004 10:14:00 AM PDT by Bush2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Bush2000
Any oringinal code that has been expanded, modified and patched more than twice is spaghetti by virtue of that very fact, and can accurately be called such without looking at it at all.

8 posted on 07/09/2004 10:20:30 AM PDT by William Terrell (Individuals can exist without government but government can't exist without individuals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Bush2000

Notice how its Microsoft only? Could it be because of the braindead shell: scheme handling of the OS? If it is a Mozilla flaw, why is Microsoft removing it in XP SP2?


9 posted on 07/09/2004 10:21:51 AM PDT by sigSEGV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Bush2000

Yes, and a patch was released by Mozilla within 24 hours. How quickly do MS release patches for their flaws?


10 posted on 07/09/2004 10:22:28 AM PDT by toadthesecond
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: toadthesecond

Not to mention, a 5K patch that doesn't require a reboot. Even modem users can download this one.


11 posted on 07/09/2004 10:25:37 AM PDT by sigSEGV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: sigSEGV

Or, an upgrade to IE6 that forces you to install outlook and media player...


12 posted on 07/09/2004 10:34:39 AM PDT by toadthesecond
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: NJ_gent
he price for integration and backwards compatability

Not if its modular code, a good code design should have clear inputs and output if you want to make a compatability layer write it seperatly and feed it into the inputs. Now I dont know if MS is doing this (it a Unix must).

13 posted on 07/09/2004 10:50:05 AM PDT by N3WBI3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Bush2000
Mozilla/Firefox bug Allows Remote Code Execution (Windows only)

Apparently, the problem is with Windows, not Mozilla, since there only appears to be a problem with XP, and Mozilla avoids this problem when run under other operating systems, including 95/98.

14 posted on 07/09/2004 10:52:19 AM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Bush2000

Patched in a few hours, and fixable by settings in 0 minutes. This bug is due to the fact that when Mozilla / Firefox encounter a protocal they dont know how to handel they hand it off to the OS (which is why it only affected windows), a quick setting. When is MS going to have there patch out for the latest IE bug? something about SP2?


15 posted on 07/09/2004 10:53:59 AM PDT by N3WBI3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: N3WBI3
....that the final stable SP2 is coming soon.

Soon is not good enough. We need it now.

16 posted on 07/09/2004 11:01:34 AM PDT by beckett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bush2000

I'll take one security bug every once in a long while over doing weekly security/bug fixes on a browser that's so tightly integrated into the OS as to allow the attacker more control over my computer than me, and so inherently insecure (activeX, zones, etc) as to make it almost impossible to fix without a complete re-write. :-)


17 posted on 07/09/2004 11:08:47 AM PDT by NJ_gent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: N3WBI3
"Not if its modular code, a good code design should have clear inputs and output if you want to make a compatability layer write it seperatly and feed it into the inputs."

I wholeheartedly agree.

"Now I dont know if MS is doing this"

Oh, I see you haven't used Windows much. You should come along and experience the 'joy' of having bug-ridden and securityless (to make a word up) software tightly integrated so that one bug in one thing affects everything else.
18 posted on 07/09/2004 11:12:47 AM PDT by NJ_gent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Bush2000
I just knew you'd be latching on to that bug (already fixed btw) like a life preserver. I'm sure you'd never bother to mention that it only works if you couple Mozilla to a broken operating system, like, say microsoft's windows.

hahaha... don't you have sopme computers to patch or something?

19 posted on 07/09/2004 11:32:04 AM PDT by zeugma (The Great Experiment is over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: N3WBI3; All
Crosslinked:

 Hijacked! New Browser Exploits Plague Web
 

20 posted on 07/09/2004 12:21:09 PM PDT by backhoe (Just an old Keyboard Cowboy, ridin' the Trackball into the Sunset...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson