Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tpaine

"Exactly, -- such a prohibitory law would violate Sec. 10 of the SC Constitution, in its enforcement. You just admitted that hugh."

Pure Unadulterated Nonsense. Not everyone solicits prostitution on private property behind closed doors.

Yes you'd like me to give up. Not just yet though. I like to laugh. When are you going to sue NC, VA, and SC for outlawing prostitution?


397 posted on 07/23/2004 12:42:19 PM PDT by H.Akston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 395 | View Replies ]


To: H.Akston
-- they can't peep into your windows at night to see if you're trading money for sex.
This is the protection that you and tpaine are depending on.

Exactly, -- such a prohibitory law would violate Sec. 10 of the SC Constitution, in its enforcement.
You just admitted that hugh.

But SC does have the power to outlaw prostitution.

Absurd conclusion, hugh. You can't have it both ways.
Give it up, -- you are playing a legalistic, bizarre word game to defend your position.

Pure Unadulterated Nonsense. Not everyone solicits prostitution on private property behind closed doors.

Who claimed they did?
The public/commercial aspects of prostitution are quite easily & constitutionally regulated by the State. Nevada is a good example.

Yes you'd like me to give up. Not just yet though. I like to laugh.

Hugh, the big laugh here is your irrational position. Do yourself a favor and get real.

398 posted on 07/23/2004 12:56:23 PM PDT by tpaine (No man has a natural right to commit aggression on the equal rights of another. - T. Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 397 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson