Exactly, -- such a prohibitory law would violate Sec. 10 of the SC Constitution, in its enforcement.
You just admitted that hugh.
But SC does have the power to outlaw prostitution.
Absurd conclusion, hugh. You can't have it both ways.
Give it up, -- you are playing a legalistic, bizarre word game to defend your position.
Pure Unadulterated Nonsense. Not everyone solicits prostitution on private property behind closed doors.
Who claimed they did?
The public/commercial aspects of prostitution are quite easily & constitutionally regulated by the State. Nevada is a good example.
Yes you'd like me to give up. Not just yet though. I like to laugh.
Hugh, the big laugh here is your irrational position. Do yourself a favor and get real.
When will you be suing VA, NC and SC for outlawing prostitution? I want to come see the circus.
"The public/commercial aspects of prostitution are quite easily & constitutionally regulated by the State. Nevada is a good example."
"regulated" only applies to Nevada. "regulated" implies it's tolerated and controlled by the state. Nothing of the sort happens in the other states. What it is, is "made illegal", which means "outlawed".
All of a sudden, you forgot about VA NC and SC! (where it is outlawed.)