"All the FF [Founding Fathers] would need to see is CA, claiming that they can prohibit arms because -- "Congress shall make no law"; --
-- just as as you two contend."
Hey - if California doesn't have the sense to have in its constitution a right to bear arms, then the supremacy clause puts it in. - just like you contend, i.e. "The 'Barron' opinion was wrong, as it completely ignored the supremacy clause. "151 (it scares me when we agree)
"All the FF [Founding Fathers] would need to see is CA, claiming that they can prohibit arms because -- "Congress shall make no law"; --
-- just as as you two contend."
151
__________________________________________
Hey - if California doesn't have the sense to have in its constitution a right to bear arms, then the supremacy clause puts it in. - just like you contend, i.e.
"The 'Barron' opinion was wrong, as it completely ignored the supremacy clause. "
(it scares me when we agree)
250 hugh
______________________________________
Akston, we don't agree.
You think states have the power to ignore ~some~ of our rights to life, liberty, or property.
You are wrong.