Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: H.Akston

"All the FF [Founding Fathers] would need to see is CA, claiming that they can prohibit arms because -- "Congress shall make no law"; --
-- just as as you two contend."
151

__________________________________________


Hey - if California doesn't have the sense to have in its constitution a right to bear arms, then the supremacy clause puts it in. - just like you contend, i.e.
"The 'Barron' opinion was wrong, as it completely ignored the supremacy clause. "

(it scares me when we agree)
250 hugh

______________________________________


Akston, we don't agree.
You think states have the power to ignore ~some~ of our rights to life, liberty, or property.

You are wrong.


252 posted on 07/15/2004 10:21:14 PM PDT by tpaine (No man has a natural right to commit aggression on the equal rights of another. - T. Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies ]


To: tpaine

OK. I feel less scared now :)


257 posted on 07/16/2004 6:00:22 AM PDT by H.Akston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson