1 posted on
07/08/2004 7:29:05 AM PDT by
kattracks
To: kattracks
After failing to persuade her to run for president in 2004, Bill Clinton desperately tried to convince his wife Hillary to team up with John Kerry as his running mate Sounds like he just wants her out of the house to me.
2 posted on
07/08/2004 7:32:10 AM PDT by
Michael.SF.
('We are going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good ' - Hillary Marx)
To: kattracks
"We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." The communist-sounding phraseology The democrats philosophy in a nut shell.
To: kattracks
4 posted on
07/08/2004 7:35:10 AM PDT by
AmishDude
(Don't Drink and FReep. You might spill beer on your keyboard.)
To: kattracks
The title of that book fits my perception exactly. After listening to the CD of the show "Evita", I was struck with the similarities between Hitlery and Evita Peron. Conniving, manipulating and ruthlessly selfish.
6 posted on
07/08/2004 7:35:43 AM PDT by
Redleg Duke
(Stir the pot...don't let anything settle to the bottom where the lawyers can feed off of it!)
To: kattracks
Hitlery is a better Strategist than Bill.
She knows that she and Bill couldn't guarantee that Kerry/Clinton would win, but they could guarantee that Kerry/Anyone Else would lose, leaving 2008 as an open race.
So9
To: kattracks
I wondered why the hilldabeast would make that inflamitory statement myself. Maybe this guy is right.
8 posted on
07/08/2004 7:36:55 AM PDT by
Ditter
To: kattracks
Sounds like disinfo to me....as though they almost support Kerry....when they have no intention
of...and will infact torpedo 'the not so swift' boat captain.....but do it in such a way as to not bring disfavor upon themselvews with their fellow dims...
Cosmetic surgery...a little nip n tuck & lipo suck....and Hilldy will be ready in '08
imo
9 posted on
07/08/2004 7:37:08 AM PDT by
joesnuffy
(Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
To: kattracks
...more baloney to whet liberal appetites for xxxillary .... xxxlintons NEVER release such information w/out a reason
10 posted on
07/08/2004 7:39:32 AM PDT by
InvisibleChurch
(I actually did vote for the $87 billion before I voted against it)
To: kattracks
"We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." The communist-sounding phraseology set off political smoke alarms, raising questions about why the savvy senator would commit such a blooper."
The wide-load may be doing a lot of this before the election in order to sink sKerry.
All of these remarks should be archived in one place and brought up when and if she decides to run in 2008.
12 posted on
07/08/2004 7:54:57 AM PDT by
LADY J
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson