"Who among you my fellow Freepers have studied up on this? Is she just a grassy knoller or does she have a solid case?"
I think I saw her a couple of years back on O'Reilly. She has some compelling bits and pieces, but I came away thinking she hadn't produced anything that proves her theory in its entirety, only cooraborative "facts" are cooroborating minor stuff.
I do have a very hard time accepting McVeigh fell on his own sword, so to speak, to protect some shadowy terrorist organization. He was a nutcase, to be sure....but the "profile" doesn't support the notion. Neither does the testimony, and interviews, of those that knew him well.
Read it and decide for yourself. I found it very compelling. She has documentation from hundreds of people on the scene before and after the explosion and lets the avalanche of info speak for itself.