Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cake_crumb

yea- just my point is that because of that fear of being tared Bush does not take a more public approach to damning Enron and linking it properly to Clinton. So the Bush staff thinks the safer approach is to say nothing and let the system do the work. For the media of course Bush's silence means guilt and talking about Enron would mean even more guilt as they see it. Catch-22.


33 posted on 07/07/2004 1:31:43 PM PDT by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: Destro

It's too easy for the Dems to refute any attempt to link them to Lay. He has given so much more money to the RNC and Repub candidates than he has to Dems and the DNC that it would backfire. Better to just let it go.


40 posted on 07/07/2004 1:33:52 PM PDT by creepycrawly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: Destro
"For the media of course Bush's silence means guilt and talking about Enron would mean even more guilt as they see it. Catch-22."

Right. This is just another way the Democrats put Republicans on the defensive all the time. By implying - not PROVING - guilt. It's the oldest trick in the book. As much as I love the president, I'll be disappointed if he doesn't begin mentioning it among the list of his administration's accomplishments at every speesh for the next week.

53 posted on 07/07/2004 1:42:42 PM PDT by cake_crumb (UN Resolutions = Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson