[Destro]

its up to Bush to make that point. When Bush talks about the corporate scandals, he never mentions when they occurred.

AMEN!! I think that he is not doing it because the campaign staff does not want to do that and have the fact that there was an association with Bush - an association of course that was minor one that you would find between any gov and powerful company - an association that had no way to influence anything for Enron because Bush was the gov of Texas and the Feds under Clinton regulated the energy business - with all that said they would still tar Bush with Enron and Bush is thus gun shy.

It is sad that the truth can be twisted so much it loses meaning.

[cake_crumb]

IIRC, the media already did tar him with his vague association with Enron while ignoring Clinton's much closer association with them (Indian power plants, anyone?)

[oceanview]

but they are doing that anyway (or trying to).

its more then just Enron, they became a poster child for the media because they were an "evil energy company". the fraud in tech stocks, and the links with those on wall street, dwarfed Enron.