Posted on 07/06/2004 12:54:28 PM PDT by teuf
There are many articles which have pointed out the distortions, falsehoods, and lies in the film Fahrenheit 9/11. This report compiles the Fahrenheit 9/11 deceits which have been identified by a wide variety of reviewers. In addition, I identify some inaccuracies which have not been addressed by other writers.
The report follows the approximate order in which the movie covers particular topics: the Bush family, Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan, and Iraq. This report focuses solely on factual issues, and not on aesthetic criticism of the film.
To understand the deceptions, it helps to understand Moores ideological position. So let us start with Moores belief that the September 11 attacks on the United States were insignificant.
Edward Koch, the former Democratic Mayor of New York City, writes:
A year after 9/11, I was part of a panel discussion on BBC-TVs Question Time show which aired live in the United Kingdom. A portion of my commentary at that time follows:
One of the panelists was Michael Moore During the warm-up before the studio audience, Moore said something along the lines of I dont know why we are making so much of an act of terror. It is three times more likely that you will be struck by lightning than die from an act of terror. I mention this exchange because it was not televised, occurring as it did before the show went live. It shows where he was coming from long before he produced Fahrenheit 9/11.
Edward Koch, Moores propaganda film cheapens debate, polarizes nation, World Tribune, June 28, 2004. By the way, I don't disagree with the point that it is reasonable to consider the number of deaths from any particular problem, including terrorism, in assessing how serious the problem is. Moore's point, however, was willfully oblivious to the fact that al Qaeda did not intend 9/11 to be the last word; the organization was working on additional attacks, and if the organization obtained the right weapons, millions of people might be killed. More fundamentally, even if Moore's argument in London is conceded to be legitimate, it contradicts Fahrenheit 9/11's presentation of Moore as intensely concerned about the September 11 attacks.
As we go through the long list of lies and tricks in Fahrenheit 9/11, keep in mind that Michael Moore has assembled a war room of political operatives and lawyers in order to respond to criticism of Fahrenheit 9/11 and to file defamation suits. (Jack Shafer, Libel Suit 9/11. Michael Moores hysterical, empty threats, Slate.com, June 12, 2004.) One of Moore's "war room" officials is Chris Lehane; Lehane, as an employee of Democratic presidential candidate Wesley Clark (who was also supported by Moore), apparently spread rumors to the press about John Kerry's alleged extra-marital affair.
Of course if there are any genuine errors in this report, the errors will be promptly corrected. On July 5, I removed a complaint about a Presidential approval poll number, which I had wrongly thought was not supported by data.
Conversely, because Moore has a paid expert staff which is monitoring criticism of the movie, it is reasonable to assume thatunless I have specifically retracted some item in this reportMoore and his staff have not offered a persuasive rebuttal.
In this report, I number Moores deceits. Some of them are outright lies; some are omissions which create a false impression. Others involve different forms of deception. A few are false statements Moore has made when defending the film.
(Excerpt) Read more at davekopel.com ...
57 varieties of error in F9/11
Bump.
Read this later BUMP!
Bump!
Anyone have an email address for this guy?
I saw the "film" and found more than he had published, but the only address I found for him was dave@i2i.org which bounced.
Bookmark
I'm surprised anyone took the time to analyze the entire movie - reminds me of the 'hidden messages' found by playing LPs backwards. The movie is being made into more than it realy is - remember "Blair Witch Project'.
Bump
BUMP!
bump
Excellent... This needs to be spread all over the internet.
Email your friends with the link. Even if they don't read the whole thing, the message is clear. The film is a load of BS.
Why not go for the gusto and show 911 decitful tactics used by Michael Moore in the film and its promotion (including "lost my distributor 8 weeks before release", "this film is not yet rated", "that's really my body in the figure edited to appear shaking hands with Bush on the poster", "we tried to call Mr. Bradbury back...")
59 lies? Someone needs to ask Axis Mikey if that is more or less than were in the Nazi film "The Eternal Jew".
Great post and great information. Too bad facts only confuse liberals. Their minds are made up and nothing (least of all, facts that prove their position is wrong) is going to change that.
Best Regards
Sergio
bump
Can someone post what the new additions are? Last I read this article, there were 56 deciets.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.