Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alberta's Child
How about the Catholic politician who is personally opposed to spousal abuse signing a law that permits husbands to beat their wives?

Are you saying there is broad support for spousal abuse from the citizens of your state and the legislature?

How about the death penalty? Can a catholic politician be personally opposed to it yet take a principled stand to execute the will of the majority of citizens in his state by signing a death penalty law and implimenting it?
48 posted on 07/06/2004 1:19:18 PM PDT by BikerNYC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: BikerNYC
How about the death penalty? Can a catholic politician be personally opposed to it yet take a principled stand to execute the will of the majority of citizens in his state by signing a death penalty law and implimenting it?

The death penalty is NOT on a same moral level. It has never been. This pope is personally opposed to it as states are better able to incarcerate criminals, but the church has never taught that it should be outlawed. It is to be used with prudence, but such moves should be up to the states themselves. The catechism signed by this pope says it, too.

51 posted on 07/06/2004 1:23:49 PM PDT by Desdemona ("He throws like a girl." - my mom's observation of John Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

To: BikerNYC
Are you saying there is broad support for spousal abuse from the citizens of your state and the legislature?

Not yet.

And that's not a joke, either. At one time there was no "broad support" for such things as abortion, stem cell research, human cloning, homosexual marriage, etc.

In light of how quickly those issues have entered the realm of public acceptance, there isn't a single idiotic idea -- no matter how wacky and outlandish it may seem -- that you can point to today and say with any credibility that there will not be any "broad support" for it even three years from now.

At one time slavery was ingrained in the economy and culture of the American South. Does this mean that it was perfectly acceptable for someone who was "personally opposed" to the concept of slavery to support legislation that strictly enforced the rights of slave owners?

52 posted on 07/06/2004 1:26:02 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Ego numquam pronunciare mendacium . . . sed ego sum homo indomitus")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

To: BikerNYC

IMO, you will find large numbers of people who say "I could never personally have an abortion because I think it's murder. If someone else chooses, it's between her and her God. I would never force my morality on others."

OR

"I support abortion only in cases of rape or incest. And, well, if the mother's health is at risk."

You'd be surprised how many "pro-choice" voters spew either or both lines.


147 posted on 07/06/2004 4:31:33 PM PDT by Jaded (Clothes make the man. Naked people have little or no influence on society. - Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson