1 posted on
07/05/2004 6:26:08 PM PDT by
blam
To: FairOpinion
2 posted on
07/05/2004 6:26:51 PM PDT by
blam
To: blam
Another good one. Thanks!
3 posted on
07/05/2004 6:33:14 PM PDT by
Coyoteman
(I'm an archaeologist; I work for a living!)
To: *Gods, Graves, Glyphs; A.J.Armitage; abner; adam_az; AdmSmith; Alas Babylon!; blam; NukeMan; ...
"The lifespan of our ancestors made a dramatic leap 32,000 years ago, allowing people to grow older and wiser, according to a study of hundreds of ancient teeth that is published today.
The wear on the teeth suggest that longevity more than quadrupled at that time, a jump that may have been the key factor that shaped modern civilisation. Before then lifespan had increased only steadily."
PING
This is a "Gods, Graves, Glyphs" -- Archeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc. PING list.
Please FREEPMAIL me, if you want on or off this list.
4 posted on
07/05/2004 6:40:46 PM PDT by
FairOpinion
(If you are not voting for Bush, you are voting for the terrorists.)
To: KayEyeDoubleDee
Lifespan extended dramatically in the early Upper Palaeolithic Period, around 30,000bc, when Homo sapiens - modern man - was becoming established in Europe. The American team believes there had to be a distinct evolutionary advantage to large numbers of people growing older, which in turn enabled still more of our ancestors to live longer. Knowing absolutely nothing whatsoever about paleoanthropology, how much d'ya wanna bet this was precisely the point at which early man harnassed fire?
Other candidates might be: Discovered seed-based plant agriculture, discovered husbandry-based animal agriculture, discovered spoken language, discovered the idea of rudimentary written notations, discovered the spear [probably just a tad early for bows and arrows],...
Or maybe was privy to a little divine intervention?
To: blam
Great find. Article mentions that it's difficult to speculate on the causes for the longevity jump, but my money is on a great advancement in communication. Yea, they already had a primitive language, but I propose that this was the time when it became more structured. No matter what other innovations were put forth at this time, without the ability to communicate these ideas, they would have been limited in scope.
10 posted on
07/05/2004 7:07:42 PM PDT by
Dysart
To: blam
The wear on the teeth suggest that longevity more than quadrupled at that time...Absolute nonsense. If the average life span had been 25 years, a figure which seems to be way too low, according to the authors the average longevity would then have jumped up to 100.
To: blam
By calculating the ratio of old-to-young individuals in the samples, the scientists found that the number of surviving older people increased throughout human evolution. And the sample is how many?
15 posted on
07/05/2004 8:07:44 PM PDT by
Lester Moore
(Every knee shall bow and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord of All)
To: blam
.....or did they learn to stone-grind foods and grain and thereby consume more abrasive particles, accelerating tooth wear........... ......or did the older generations start worrying about the younger's behavior and future...and grind their teeth as they slept..... ....or..
16 posted on
07/05/2004 9:00:45 PM PDT by
PoorMuttly
("BE Reagan !")
To: PatrickHenry; Junior; longshadow; jennyp
20 posted on
07/06/2004 7:03:34 AM PDT by
VadeRetro
(You don't just bat those big liquid eyes and I start noticing how lovely you are. Hah!)
To: blam
Society's still being shaped by old age. The older I get the more my "society" changes.
:-p
26 posted on
01/08/2006 12:58:17 AM PST by
bannie
(The government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend upon the support of Paul.)
27 posted on
08/09/2006 10:50:58 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(updated my FR profile on Thursday, August 10, 2006. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: blam
28 posted on
01/03/2010 10:03:07 AM PST by
SunkenCiv
(Happy New Year!)
To: blam
And it would have encouraged the passing of information from old and experienced individuals to younger generations, the "grandmother hypothesis"- grandmothers are useful because of the knowledge they hand on to their reproductive-age daughters, and their daughters' children. The Barakamites see no value to the elderly! Throw'em under the bus!!!
29 posted on
05/19/2010 3:43:43 PM PDT by
night reader
(NRA Life Member since 1962)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson