Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Shrunk to Size, Hussein Faces His Reckoning [from a reporter in the courtroom]
The NY Times ^ | Published: July 4, 2004 | JOHN F. BURNS

Posted on 07/03/2004 9:12:12 AM PDT by summer


Saddam Hussein being led in shackles from an Iraqi courtroom on Thursday, after hearing a list of preliminary charges against him and 11 other former Iraqi leaders.

Shrunk to Size, Hussein Faces His Reckoning

By JOHN F. BURNS

Published: July 4, 2004

BAGHDAD, Iraq — It was only in the courtroom, at the American military base, that their physical insignificance, their sheer unremitting ordinariness, became so plain.

On television last Thursday, the images of the 12 former Iraqi leaders conveyed an altogether bigger impression, perhaps because the lens tightened until their faces filled the screen. But to a reporter sitting 25 feet away, for the five hours it took to complete preliminary hearings against Saddam Hussein and 11 others who terrorized Iraq, they seemed to have shrunk, pressing home the question: How could these utterly unremarkable men, forgettable in any other context, have so tyrannized their 25 million countrymen that they remained unchallenged for 35 years?

Perhaps it was the fear that made them seem, in person, so small. When a man takes a nation by the throat, in the way that Stalin did, and Hitler and Mao, then retreats into secret places, the propaganda images - the menacing statues, the brooding portraits, the leader saluting massed parades - become a reality of their own.

So it was with Mr. Hussein, who stared down at every corner, on walls in every office and every home, until the apprehension settled, even among foreigners, that he was always watching. No matter that he almost never appeared anywhere that made him accessible to ordinary Iraqis, sending out a team of doubles to maintain the pretense of being the people's tribune, while sparing him from assassins' threats; immured in his palaces, he was ever the grim but inaccessible colossus.

That era ended, when he emerged last December from his coffin-like bunker near Tikrit, looking like a vagrant as he surrendered to American troops. Since then, he has been sequestered somewhere outside Baghdad, on the promise that he would, in time, be brought into an Iraqi court.

Now, at the base the Americans call Camp Victory, there was the courtroom's silence, taut expectation gripping the 35 people waiting for that moment to arrive: the judge and clerks of the Iraqi Special Tribunal, established under the American occupation to hold Mr. Hussein's government accountable for its crimes; officials of Iraq's interim government, empowered earlier in the week when sovereignty was formally restored; the American admiral in sports club casuals overseeing the media pool; a handful of reporters, Iraqis and Americans, representing hundreds of others. At last, there were footsteps approaching, manacles and restraining chain tinkling, doors opening, two Iraqi guards gripping the prisoner; all imaginings spent.

Before the court, at that instant, 25 years almost to the week after he seized power in Baghdad, stood Saddam Hussein al-Majid al-Tikriti, the man who awarded himself titles of honor and glory to fill a foolscap page; the man who launched, or in some measure provoked, three disastrous wars; the man whose legacy runs to countless mass graves, and to hundreds of thousands of Iraqis killed, his very name synonymous, across much of the world, with a totalitarianism that turned the Iraqi state into a machinery of torture and death.

The next 26 minutes were as compelling as any in a reporter's life. My notes, I realized later, were scribbled even less legibly than normal, reflecting the tension of a moment awaited, in a manner of speaking, since I reached Baghdad for the first time as a reporter nearly 15 years ago, when I imagined, hopelessly, like other Western journalists, that I might one day get an interview with Mr. Hussein: "Saddam looking wasted, emaciated, bearded; footsteps uncertain, manner exhausted, eyes scanning left and right. His voice: husky at first, then oddly high-pitched, at moments nearly breaking."

"Under strain," I wrote a minute or two later, "rubbing eyes, finger to eyebrow, hand splayed to cheek, timbre of voice changed."

On the images that rolled on Iraqi television every night until the Americans came, Mr. Hussein was always shown as indominable, his presence diminishing all others. Until he picked up a cigar at a palace meeting, nobody else in his inner councils dared; when he spoke, top aides sat expectant, heads angled reverently, pencils poised. If he joked, all laughed; if his mood darkened, all would frown.

But in the courtroom, in a mosque annex within a lakeside palace complex near Baghdad airport that serves as the American military headquarters in Iraq, he seemed, in those first moments, like nothing so much as a man quite lost.

Over the next half-hour, that changed as he recovered something of his old presence and resolve, assuring that the stories that went around the world were mostly about an unrepentant Mr. Hussein defying the court, condemning the American occupation and the Iraqis collaborating with it, and declaring himself the lawful president. As well, he pronounced Kuwait to be Iraq's legitimate territory and leaders "animals," and he belittled the 1988 poison-gassing of Halabja , and his own alleged role, as something he had "heard about on the radio," as though being accused of murdering 5,000 people in an afternoon was somehow an irrelevance, or a bagatelle.

But if Mr. Hussein looked for much of his time in the courtroom like a shadow of the man he was, he towered compared with the others. It was as though only one defendant, Mr. Hussein, believed there was anything to fight for, beyond survival. All pride spent, they behaved as though they, at least, had accepted that the game was up, and that their purpose must now be to escape going down with Mr. Hussein. Some among them, recognizing their humiliation, appeared to be holding back tears. Dictators need followers, not leaders, and these followers appeared, mainly, to have abandoned the cause, demonstrating as they did why Mr. Hussein, and not any of them, had risen to the pinnacle of the regime.

Where Mr. Hussein defied the court, they deferred.
Where he refused to review or sign papers acknowledging the proceedings, they signed, some with an almost too eager compliance. The young investigating judge had battled Mr. Hussein on issues that involved the court's legitimacy, and on the question of whether he should be entered on the papers he ultimately refused to sign as "President of the Republic of Iraq," as Mr. Hussein demanded, or as "the (former) President," as the judge instructed the clerk, adding parentheses.

But the others, who were brought to the court together by American troops - while Mr. Hussein arrived and departed alone with a separate American guard - seemed mostly intent on winning the judge's favor.

The complaisant attitudes came from some surprising quarters. Abid Hamid Mahmud al-Tikriti, Mr. Hussein's former bodyguard and secretary, listened intently to the rights available to all appearing before the tribunal - to a lawyer, paid for by the state if they are indigent, as well as to remain silent in court - and offered his congratulations. "These rights are excellent," he said, smiling broadly.

It was left to others to ponder whether Mr. Mahmud, accused of "crimes against the Iraqi people" in the brutal repression of a Shiite uprising in 1991 in which tens of thousands of people died, had considered what the absence of such rights had meant to Iraqis who fell victim to the old regime.

Ali Hassan al-Majid, known as Chemical Ali for his alleged role in overseeing the Halabja attack, was also pleased, smiling broadly at the judge after the rights were read and saying, "Thank you, thank you." Then he asked if the judge could help him track down his counsel. "If you don't mind, I'm going to give you a piece of paper with a telephone number of the lawyer," he said.

Steadying himself on his walking stick as he rose to leave, he invoked God's help, as did Mr. Hussein and several others. "In the name of God the most Merciful and Compassionate," he said, quoting from the Koran.

Salem Chalabi, executive director of the tribunal and nephew of Ahmed Chalabi, once the Pentagon's favorite for leadership of Iraq, said when the hearing ended that at least one of the men had offered to cooperate in return for escaping the death penalty, agreeing to testify against others, but that no decision had been made. While the hearings that began on Thursday will continue, with the judge deciding who has a case to answer, Iraqi and American officials have said that trials are not likely to begin at any time soon. In Mr. Hussein's case, they have hinted, the date could be a year away, or even more.

At least two detainees - Tariq Aziz, the former deputy prime minister who headed crucial diplomatic negotiations, and Sultan Hashim Ahmed, who was defense minister when the Americans invaded last year - suggested in court that they may seek to save themselves at trial by arguing that all blame should be shifted to Mr. Hussein, or at least to a small group around him.

Like Nazi leaders at Nuremberg, Mr. Hashim claimed that at times when he is alleged to have participated in mass killings he was only taking orders; Mr. Aziz claimed that being a member of Mr. Hussein's Revolutionary Command Council should not be taken as proof that he had anything to do with decisions leading to deaths of innocents that were made by the "leadership," meaning Mr. Hussein.


From their confusion as they arrived, and the relief that some showed after talking with the judge, it seemed plain that none of the 12 knew more than vaguely what to expect when they reached the court. For men who held unlimited powers, with little or no need to consult law books, it seemed possible that the moment when the manacles were removed and they stepped into court may also have been the first moment they realized that they were to be assured of rights, or even what legal rights in a country emerging from dictatorship might entail.

American military spokesmen have said before that none of the "high value detainees," including Mr. Hussein, have been allowed to know what has happened in Iraq since they fell into American hands, and it was possible the confusion did not stop there. At one point, a former prime minister, Muhammad Hamza al-Zubaydi, who is 66, asked for the judge's helping fixing the years in which he held various posts, saying he was "exhausted from the flight" to the hearing.

It was the strongest hint all day of something the Americans have kept a guarded secret: where Mr. Hussein and others have been confined. Since none of the Iraqis made any mention of the issue before the court, the implication seemed to be that they, too, may have little idea where they have been, even whether they have in fact been in Iraq, as American officers have hinted but never conclusively affirmed.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: iraq; iraqijustis; iraqitribunal; johnfburns; prisonersaddam
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: summer

Excellent article from the exceptional John Burns. Finally I have what feels like a reasonably complete picture of the courtroom that day. All the other reporting has been like looking through a keyhole. We hear from one report that Saddam was nervous and in another, defiant. Now we see that it was both.

I think Saddam's underlings are going to go turncoat on him. I think we (or I should say, the Iraqis) have this one in the bag, regardless of how many slicked back Euroweasel attorneys are there to throw a monkeywrench into this thing.


21 posted on 07/03/2004 10:58:28 AM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yardstick

To Sadaam: Goodbye EVIL ONE...

May you reap what you have sown,
May you feel the horror and pains;
And may you writhe, fear and groan
as did the victims killed by Husseins.

The hourglass is emptying fast,
you must breathe slowly now
the air will no longer last;
your death is now only how?

Goodbye, good riddance evil one.
Your body will never more rest,
No virgins, no life, no more fun.
It is hell to pay, the devil's guest.


22 posted on 07/03/2004 12:46:22 PM PDT by Kackikat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Yardstick; elhombrelibre; livius; dbwz; Dog Gone; the Real fifi
Re: The many positive comments on this thread about the fine writing of this NYT journalist in Bagdad, John F Burns

From link below, Sept 2003:

The following are the words of New York Times correspondent John F. Burns, on his experiences reporting from Baghdad during the war. Excerpted from the book Embedded: The Media at War in Iraq, an Oral History [....]

John Burns: 'There is Corruption in Our Business'

Excerpt:


[....]Terror, totalitarian states, and their ways are nothing new to me, but I felt from the start that this [terror in Iraq] was in a category by itself, with the possible exception in the present world of North Korea. I felt that that was the central truth that has to be told about this place. It was also the essential truth that was untold by the vast majority of correspondents here. Why? Because they judged that the only way they could keep themselves in play here was to pretend that it was okay.

There were correspondents who thought it appropriate to seek the approbation of the people who governed their lives. This was the ministry of information, and particularly the director of the ministry. By taking him out for long candlelit dinners, plying him with sweet cakes, plying him with mobile phones at $600 each for members of his family, and giving bribes of thousands of dollars. Senior members of the information ministry took hundreds of thousands of dollars of bribes from these television correspondents who then behaved as if they were in Belgium. They never mentioned the function of minders. Never mentioned terror.

In one case, a correspondent actually went to the Internet Center at the Al-Rashid Hotel and printed out copies of his and other people's stories -- mine included -- specifically in order to be able to show the difference between himself and the others. He wanted to show what a good boy he was compared to this enemy of the state. He was with a major American newspaper.

Yeah, it was an absolutely disgraceful performance. CNN's Eason Jordan's op-ed piece in The New York Times missed that point completely. [....]

-----------------------

from summer: He also mentioned in the above that he is 58 years old. Maybe he is wiser than some of his counterparts in Iraq, with a longer view as to the horrors of terrorism. And, he sees the US as a country that cares.

Another excerpt, from the same link:

[....] That night at 8:00 p.m, I went to every floor of the ministry. I told everybody. "Get off! Get off this building. It's going to be attacked this night."

When I got back to my hotel room I got another call from New York saying it's been put off twenty-four hours because of weather. It was after my second meeting with Al-Tayyib that they raided my room. He shouted at me. He said, "We know you're a CIA agent because they attacked the ministry." I said, "You lying son of a bitch. I told you that because I come from a newspaper and a country who cares about people. We were told this on the basis of human decency. Not just for ourselves but also for Iraqis. They didn't want to kill innocent Iraqis. You failed to do anything at all about it." [....]
23 posted on 07/03/2004 1:29:05 PM PDT by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist

I meant to ping you on my post #23 re the John F Burns link.


24 posted on 07/03/2004 1:30:00 PM PDT by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: summer

Bagdad, = Baghdad,


25 posted on 07/03/2004 1:34:06 PM PDT by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

RE your post #20 - Thanks, I will read that.


26 posted on 07/03/2004 1:38:18 PM PDT by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Snerfling; Rennes Templar

See post #23.


27 posted on 07/03/2004 1:39:42 PM PDT by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Thanks for posting those photos.


28 posted on 07/03/2004 1:46:40 PM PDT by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist; Yardstick; elhombrelibre; livius; dbwz; Dog Gone; the Real fifi
Also re John F Burns: Photo and bio
29 posted on 07/03/2004 1:50:24 PM PDT by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Rose in RoseBear

You might also find posts #23 and #29, re this NYT author, to be interesting. :)


30 posted on 07/03/2004 1:53:32 PM PDT by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

Evil is never "radical," ...it is only extreme, and... it possesses neither depth nor any demonic dimension...>>>

I daresay Hannah Arendt doesn't know what in Hell she is talking about. Or at least didn't at the time she wrote this. (One way or 'tother, she does now.)


31 posted on 07/03/2004 1:59:17 PM PDT by Ronly Bonly Jones (truth is truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: summer
It was only in the courtroom, at the American military base, that their physical
insignificance, their sheer unremitting ordinariness, became so plain.


"The Banality of Evil"

That was a title of a book on The Holocaust, IIRC.
32 posted on 07/03/2004 2:02:59 PM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

These guards are Iraqi. I can only
surmise there were Americans who
handed him off & received him back
from & into custody. Surely Burns
noticed this.


33 posted on 07/03/2004 2:07:11 PM PDT by txrangerette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: summer

Reminds me of the history of Nuremburg.

The Nazi thugs, no different in spirit than these Baathist thugs, behaved in much the same manner, and appeared to the onlookers much the same way: shrunken insignificant men when stripped of their power to deal death and destruction on their fellow men.

The only difference is that this bunch has their erstwhile leader still amongst their number.

I hope they hang them all.


34 posted on 07/03/2004 2:10:11 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (Independence forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
shrunken insignificant men when stripped of their power to deal death and destruction on their fellow men.

What is that quote I am thinking of about WWII? Something like "All that is necessary for evil to succeed is for good people to do nothing." I think, in the end, history will be very kind to GW.
35 posted on 07/03/2004 2:27:10 PM PDT by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: summer
The great British statesman Edmund Burke spoke that truth in the 18th century, in fact.

Such wisdom is timeless, and applies to any era.

"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing."

-Edmund Burke

36 posted on 07/03/2004 2:35:13 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (Independence forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Thanks. I think his quote there is engraved on a memorial about WWII.


37 posted on 07/03/2004 2:40:29 PM PDT by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Those pictures of that rotten tyrant being led around in chains made me smile. ;-)


38 posted on 07/03/2004 4:14:11 PM PDT by FierceDraka ("Party Before Country" - The New Motto of the Democratic Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson