Skip to comments.
NY Times: Saddam Trial Should Wait Until After Elections (LOL!)
The New York Times ^
| July 1, 2004
| NYT Editorial Board
Posted on 06/30/2004 10:08:15 PM PDT by Dems_R_Losers
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-99 last
To: Dems_R_Losers
Did the NYT make a similar stink in 1989 when we invaded Panama, captured their dictator, brought him to the US for trial and incarceration? No. It wasn't an election year.
81
posted on
07/01/2004 5:08:59 AM PDT
by
jriemer
(We are a Republic not a Democracy)
To: smoothsailing
lol When has the "LAW" ever applied to bjclinton?
To: Just mythoughts
83
posted on
07/01/2004 6:39:06 AM PDT
by
Dems_R_Losers
(Proud to be a Reagan Alumna!)
To: Dems_R_Losers
This is a joke.......of course the lying Moore propaganda movie & all the Bush hating books, including Checkpoint with two characters who talk about assassinating him......are perfectly acceptable to the NYT & the other Bush hating media!
84
posted on
07/01/2004 6:45:57 AM PDT
by
JulieRNR21
(One good term deserves another! Take W-04....Across America!)
To: ChadGore
Name one, just one ally of Saddam.
85
posted on
07/01/2004 7:58:44 AM PDT
by
ICX
(Al Zarqawi: "Our masturbation jihad will wipe out all American kittens unless our demands are met!")
Trial in Sept, verdict on Sept 11th.
86
posted on
07/01/2004 8:02:27 AM PDT
by
Legion04
To: Merry
I seem to recall yesterday sovereignity being handed back to Iraq. Did I miss something? Was it handed back to Iraq and the NY times? they should keep their big noses out of this and let Iraq run their own country.Precisely. Saying that we, or in this case, the NYTimes, can dictate to the judicial system of a once again sovereign country simply feeds the myth that we are still in control, and the handover was, as Alcee Hastings put it, "a myth."
They have no problem using the problems in Iraq to produce negative "political dividends" to the Bush reelection campaign, and put a damper on the positive developments, so why should something as significant and overdue as the trial of Saddam be verboten?
87
posted on
07/01/2004 8:31:08 AM PDT
by
SpinyNorman
(Al Queda, Al Jazeera, Al Gore, Al Franken: the four horsemen of the Apocalypse)
To: ChadGore
Losers. Really a bunch of losers. It's pathetic.
It is so embarrassing, I am even feeling a bit sad for them.
Really a bunch of sad, sad last-straw-graspers.
88
posted on
07/01/2004 8:46:27 AM PDT
by
AmericanInTokyo
(***Since The Iraq War & Transition Period Began, NORTH KOREA HAS MANUFACTURED (8) NUCLEAR WEAPONS***)
To: ChadGore
Name one, just one ally of Saddam. Are you series???
Ok, I'll go out on a limb; FRANCE.
89
posted on
07/01/2004 9:15:15 AM PDT
by
Condor51
(May God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't. -- Gen G. Patton Jr)
Comment #90 Removed by Moderator
Comment #91 Removed by Moderator
To: Dems_R_Losers; nutmeg
I hope the Iraqis get started right away!
(Will make for much better TV watching than Laci and Kobe and the dems will go nuts.)
92
posted on
07/01/2004 10:07:56 AM PDT
by
RottiBiz
(Help end Freepathons -- become a Monthly Donor.)
To: Dems_R_Losers
The Slimes' editorialists don't even attempt to hide their bias anymore.
93
posted on
07/01/2004 10:10:48 AM PDT
by
Mr. Mojo
To: Mike Darancette
"What happened to Saddam's right to a speedy trial?"
Liberals want the U.S. Constitution to be a "living document" remember? The term "living document" means a document that is interpreted any way the Liberals say at any given point in time.
So, this concept carries over into the re-organization of Iraq as well.
To: ChadGore
95
posted on
07/01/2004 10:20:30 AM PDT
by
hobbes1
(Hobbes1TheOmniscient® "I know everything so you don't have to" ;)
To: Dems_R_Losers
WHOA, WHOA, WHOOOOOOA! HOLD ON, STOP THE FREAKIN' PRESSES!
Excuse me New York Times, but, uh....had there been elections yet in Germany when the Nuremburg trials started?
96
posted on
07/01/2004 10:29:01 AM PDT
by
Zhangliqun
("Woe unto them who smugly show off their clean hands while their neighbors' blood is shed.")
To: Dems_R_Losers
How elitist can you get?
Uh, Punch, this isn't about you or your pal Kerry. It's an Iraqi trial of an Iraqi criminal. You flat-out have no business having a voice in the matter.
To: Merry
I seem to recall yesterday sovereignity being handed back to Iraq. Did I miss something? Was it handed back to Iraq and the NY times? they should keep their big noses out of this and let Iraq run their own country. Maybe Chirac needs to tell the NY Times to mind their own business and quit trying to tell Iraq what to do.
98
posted on
07/01/2004 10:55:39 AM PDT
by
JustaCowgirl
(Let freedom reign - George W. Bush, American President)
To: Finalapproach29er
Brokaw for Kerry VP?
You know he'll campaign hard either way...
: |
99
posted on
07/01/2004 11:14:50 AM PDT
by
AnnaZ
("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good."::: Hillar(ed)y! ::: 6/28/04)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-99 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson