Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP Wages War Against Its Conservatives
GOPUSA ^ | June.28,2004 | Christopher G. Adamo

Posted on 06/30/2004 9:38:32 PM PDT by Reagan Man

Colorado Republican Congressman Tom Tancredo is in big trouble with the GOP leadership. And just what, you may be wondering, is his great sin? "Team America," a political action committee originally founded by Tancredo, worked to unseat Representative Chris Cannon, a liberal Republican from Utah, by supporting Matthew Throckmorton, his challenger in the Republican primary.

Chief among those organizations caterwauling about the actions of Tancredo is the liberal "Tuesday Group," a coalition of approximately thirty liberal Republican House members whose goal is to steer the party to the left. Hiding under the cloak of a grossly distorted rendition of Ronald Reagan's "Eleventh Commandment" ("Thou shalt not speak ill of a fellow Republican"), the Tuesday Group is now expressing concern that party conservatives are finally making efforts to strike back.

Apparently, undermining the conservative agenda by abandoning the party at key junctures during the legislative process is perfectly fine with these Republican "centrists." But any discussion of such matters by conservatives, who have tired of seeing their party abandoning its principles, is strictly taboo. By such hypocritical assertions, these liberal "Trojan Horses" hope to continue dominating party politics from within.

Of course Ronald Reagan never intended for his "Eleventh Commandment" to be arbitrarily invoked as a means of allowing liberalism to spread, unchecked, within the ranks of the GOP. Rather, it was supposed to prevent the sort of backbiting and mud slinging within party ranks, which can ultimately undermine the credibility of the entire party.

House Majority leader Tom Delay, a longtime champion of conservatism, has found himself in the middle of this row. Seeking to maintain a cohesive Republican majority, he is promoting themes of "team spirit" and "comity" among party members. Delay even referenced Reagan's "Eleventh Commandment" in a meeting with Tancredo in which the Colorado Congressman was apparently warned to change his ways and endorse a unified party, or face retribution within Republican circles.

Unfortunately, such rhetoric fails to deal with the fact that it is the Republican liberals who regularly undermine party unity by voting with Democrats at critical junctures. With such people constantly placing the philosophies of liberalism ahead of traditional Republican principle, the only manner in which even a facade of "unity" can be maintained is for the entire party to shift to the left. This, of course, is precisely the strategy of the liberal Republicans.

Tancredo's major issue of concern is unchecked illegal immigration and the resulting compromise of America's borders. Hardly a miniscule "pet issue" of a fringe constituency, the immigration problem goes to the very core of maintaining America's national integrity and heritage. Little else of GOP principles or goals can be regarded as significant in any way, as long the party remains indifferent to the invasion of the nation's borders by a flood of illegal immigrants who, as soon as they are able to do so, will vote against such things. Yet, major forces within the GOP are once again actively working to insure that at best, the Republican counterpart to Democrat plans of opening the borders will only amount to a watered-down version of the very same thing.

By supporting truly conservative Republican challengers, Tancredo's PAC hopes to specifically target key players of the open borders advocacy for defeat during their respective state primaries. While it is not entirely clear whether or not Tancredo is still officially participating with the work of the PAC, his political ideology remains consistent with that of its members. Tancredo realizes that threats to the future of the nation are no less virulent when advanced by so-called "Republicans," than when spawned by their traditional advocates, the Democrats.

Tom Delay has, in the past, shown himself to be extremely principled, with the one notable exception being his support, under severe White House pressure, for an education bill that was essentially crafted by Ted Kennedy. He knows that if his party persists in its claims to uphold both high and low standards, only the low standards will prevail. Though presently striving to remain within the boundaries of party loyalty, he is surely aware that, as a principled conservative, his own future is no less threatened by the underhanded actions of the "moderates" than is Tancredo.

For Delay and Tancredo, whose differences are far outweighed by their political common ground, the most pressing matter is to maintain the party according to conservative principle rather than allowing the "centrists" to reinvent it in the image of the Democrats.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: conservatives; gop
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 321-327 next last

1 posted on 06/30/2004 9:38:33 PM PDT by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
Amen. It's getting to the point where I don't know where the GOP ends and the Democrats begin.
2 posted on 06/30/2004 9:42:15 PM PDT by asmith92008 (If we buy into the nonsense that we always have to vote for RINOs, we'll just end up taking the horn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

Go Tom go !


3 posted on 06/30/2004 9:44:13 PM PDT by John Lenin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: asmith92008
Amen. It's getting to the point where I don't know where the GOP ends and the Democrats begin.

For most people the choice is clear on issues of abortion, gun rights, taxes, and defense. It is too bad you don't see a difference.

4 posted on 06/30/2004 9:49:24 PM PDT by Once-Ler (Proud Republican. and Bushbot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

Ironically, I just came across the Team America site the other day while looking at some Buchanan info. The piece you posted doesn't mention that Bay Buchanan is listed as 'Co-chairman' of the Team America PAC. It should have, as knowing that Tancredo is working closely with someone who supported a third-party candidate is relevant.

In addition, Tancredo (Team America) sent out a fundraising letter in May2004 basically calling President Bush arrogant and power-mad. I find Team America's rhetoric offensive and misleading. I hope I'm not the only Republican who does.


5 posted on 06/30/2004 9:59:23 PM PDT by unsycophant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
Of course Ronald Reagan never intended for his "Eleventh Commandment" to be arbitrarily invoked as a means of allowing liberalism to spread, unchecked, within the ranks of the GOP.

That comment is huey. Mr Regan understood our enemy just as Churchill and Washington before him. He knew how to make us whole,

To rate presidents Washington was amazing , Regan was damn good.

6 posted on 06/30/2004 9:59:25 PM PDT by lizma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: asmith92008
Frankly the GOP is ready for a good fight. The so called conservatives are spending the country blind and driving moderates away with their hyper-religious ferver.

On the other hand, RINO's like Spector have no balls and cave to the slightest Democratic challenge.

The Pubbies have got to find a way to be inclusive to expand the base and fiscally responsible.

7 posted on 06/30/2004 10:01:52 PM PDT by zarf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Once-Ler
Well, you could also look at the fact that this administration jumped on the diversity bandwagon in its brief to the Supreme Court on affirmative action. Justice O'Connor, another "conservative" appointee, seized on this to enshrine reverse discrimination into the Constitution.

I'll grant that Bush is a better choice than Kerry on defense. However, that's damnation by faint praise. Who wouldn't be better than Kerry? All the same, the administration refuses to actually enlarge the military so we don;t become overstretched and allow our enemies to perceive us as weak.

Gun rights? Why hasn't the Republican Congress and White House restored the people of Washington DC their right to bear arms?

And on abortion, the administratpion was great n the partial birth abortion ban. But where is a ban on human cloning? We have New Jersey getting ready to allow it within its borders and its on the way here in California. Why has the Republican leadership not moved to cork the genie in this bottle?

On illegal immigration, the only difference between Bush and Kerry is how quickly they will throw open the borders.

And where is the strong Republican leadership on the gay marriage amendment? Outside of Rick Santorum, whom the White House gave no back up to when he pointed out the absurdity of the Lawrence decision, there are few in the Republican leadership rallying on this issue.
8 posted on 06/30/2004 10:07:39 PM PDT by asmith92008 (If we buy into the nonsense that we always have to vote for RINOs, we'll just end up taking the horn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: zarf
And then the White House supports Specter in his primary. If they couldn't endorse Toomey, which I can understand, they should have at least stayed out of it.
9 posted on 06/30/2004 10:09:03 PM PDT by asmith92008 (If we buy into the nonsense that we always have to vote for RINOs, we'll just end up taking the horn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: lizma

From the Desk of... Tom Tancredo
U.S. Congressman, Colorado's 6th District

Thursday, May 20, 2004

Dear Friends,

In January, in complete defiance of the will of the American people,
the President proposed granting amnesty to the twelve million illegal
aliens who broke our laws getting into this country.

As if that wasn't outrageous enough, Mr. Bush took it a step further
and asked Congress to include in the amnesty bill a guest worker
program that would give foreign workers from anywhere in the world
the right to come to this country and compete with Americans for jobs
here. It is the final chapter of the sellout of America.

The arrogance of those in power today is as great as it has ever been.
Knowing full well that an unprotected border threatens our national
security, increases the violence in our cities and schools, burdens
our hospitals, suppresses our wages, bankrupts our government and
balkanizes our nation, our so-called representatives do nothing to
enforce the laws of this land.

"We, the People" has been replaced as the driving force in this nation
by "We, the Corporations", a group that doesn't give a rat's tail
about our workers, our communities, or our national sovereignty for
that matter!

But it is they who are calling the shots in Congress and open borders
means cheap labor. That is good for them and they could care less
about the consequences to the nation.

Friends, the situation is URGENT! Unless we move now it may be too
late.

That is why I have asked Bay Buchanan, a fellow Reaganite and former
Treasurer of the U.S., to help me form Team America.

Team America will find, support and help elect patriots that will
stand up to the corporate and party bosses and help in the fight to
reform our immigration policies and secure our borders.




Tancredo's remarks in this fundraising letter from May seem deliberately abstruse.


10 posted on 06/30/2004 10:12:48 PM PDT by unsycophant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
"Open border advocacy" usng the universal Insta-Ideologuese-to-English translator really means: "People who refuse to machine gun women and children at the border."

No one except the fringed 3rd party hacks advocate open borders.

11 posted on 06/30/2004 10:14:26 PM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unsycophant
Tom Tancredo believes that amnesty for illegals isn't a core value the GOP should be supporting. On that point, I agree with him. As does about 80% of Americans.

I didn't see the fundraising letter you refer too. So I can't comment on his rhetoric. I do know, Tancredo supports the reelection of Bush-Cheney.

Liberal Republicans (aka.RINOs) should not have a voice in the GOP political agenda. Period. Conservatives constitute a majority of the GOP base. The party platform is based on a conservative agenda. And when Ronald Reagan appealed to Democrats in 1980 and 1984, they were conservative Democrats. Not liberal Democrats.

12 posted on 06/30/2004 10:16:48 PM PDT by Reagan Man (.....................................................The Choice is Clear....... Re-elect BUSH-CHENEY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: unsycophant
Anyone who would align with those who endorse Ralph Nader and his Socialist Workers Party cohort, and who publicly derides corporations, is the one who does not belong in the Republican Party.
13 posted on 06/30/2004 10:18:44 PM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: asmith92008
Why hasn't the Republican Congress and White House restored the people of Washington DC their right to bear arms?

Because the people of Washington DC want a gun ban. They voted for one overwhelmingly. Put to a vote, a gun ban would pass 80-20. By the way, DC will vote for Kerry about 80-20 too.

14 posted on 06/30/2004 10:20:12 PM PDT by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

To: Reagan Man

The GOP treats conservatives like the Democratic Party treats blacks. The difference is, blacks have somewhere else to go.


17 posted on 06/30/2004 10:25:03 PM PDT by Sloth (We cannot defeat foreign enemies of the Constitution if we yield to the domestic ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shanscom

Anyone who opposes amnesty for illegals, stands with a majority of the American people. That's all that matters on this issue. Tom Tancredo is right on this issue. Bay Buchanan is right on this issue. PresBush is on the wrong side of this issue and he knows it. Bush`s recent silence in support of amnesty for illegals, makes that point abundantly clear.


18 posted on 06/30/2004 10:30:27 PM PDT by Reagan Man (.....................................................The Choice is Clear....... Re-elect BUSH-CHENEY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
Liberal Republicans (aka.RINOs) should not have a voice in the GOP political agenda. Period.

To move legislation, you need the president, half the house and 60% of the senate.

That means you need bout 60% of the people to be with you. Conservatives are not 60%.

What needs to be done is to assemble a 60% group and that will mean you will need to give a voice to all 60% or else they will join the other side. If you expect the moderates to vote for your stuff and for them to have no voice, you are nuts.

19 posted on 06/30/2004 10:31:45 PM PDT by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Sloth
Nonsense. The xenophobic border-wedgies and the protectionist anti-free-trade types can go flock to Ralph Nader and his Socialist Worker's Party cohort.
20 posted on 06/30/2004 10:33:00 PM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 321-327 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson