To: Protagoras; looscnnn
Reaffirm/defend/return to the the true meaning of the Constitution & BOR.
4 posted on 06/30/2004 8:31:59 AM PDT by looscnnn
______________________________________
Only one position is really necessary:
Reaffirm/defend/return to the the original [literal] meaning of the Constitution & its Amendments.
[Which would necessitate repealing the 16th & abandoning much of 20th century fed/state/local 'law', as unconstitutional]
22 posted on
06/30/2004 9:06:11 AM PDT by
tpaine
(The line dividing good and evil cuts through the heart of every human being" -- Solzhenitsyn)
To: tpaine
Asked and answered. No agreement would be reached on the true meaning and the constitutional changes you propose have no popular support. The idea of this party would be to get elected and attain the six narrow goals identified.
One step at a time we can change the world. Freedom won't come in one fell swoop.
26 posted on
06/30/2004 9:10:02 AM PDT by
Protagoras
(government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem." ...Ronald Reagan, 1981)
To: tpaine
It would also eliminate the need to put withdraw from the UN, WTO, World Bank, etc. on the platform.
52 posted on
06/30/2004 9:49:44 AM PDT by
looscnnn
("Live free or die; death is not the worst of evils" Gen. John Stark 1809)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson