Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/30/2004 5:14:35 AM PDT by beaureguard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: beaureguard
I prefer to call her The Hila-Monster......My apologies to gila lovers out there......
2 posted on 06/30/2004 5:16:20 AM PDT by Red Badger (Semper Fidelis.......To God, Corps and Country..........................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: beaureguard

Good article on "Common Good"

http://www.scu.edu/ethics/practicing/decision/commongood.html

From article.....

First, according to some philosophers, the very idea of a common good is inconsistent with a pluralistic society like ours. Different people have different ideas about what is worthwhile or what constitutes "the good life for human beings", differences that have increased during the last few decades as the voices of more and more previously silenced groups, such as women and minorities, have been heard. Given these differences, some people urge, it will be impossible for us to agree on what particular kind of social systems, institutions, and environments we will all pitch in to support.

And even if we agreed upon what we all valued, we would certainly disagree about the relative values things have for us. While all may agree, for example, that an affordable health system, a healthy educational system, and a clean environment are all parts of the common good, some will say that more should be invested in health than in education, while others will favor directing resources to the environment over both health and education. Such disagreements are bound to undercut our ability to evoke a sustained and widespread commitment to the common good. In the face of such pluralism, efforts to bring about the common good can only lead to adopting or promoting the views of some, while excluding others, violating the principle of treating people equally. Moreover, such efforts would force everyone to support some specific notion of the common good, violating the freedom of those who do not share in that goal, and inevitably leading to paternalism (imposing one group's preference on others), tyranny, and oppression.


4 posted on 06/30/2004 5:26:32 AM PDT by COUNTrecount
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: beaureguard

Any idea what they are refering to with the nail clipping comment & the part about matching the sofa to the drapes?

(I had no idea my interior designer sister-in-law was such a powerful person, I'll have to be nicer to her.) ;9/


5 posted on 06/30/2004 5:28:50 AM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: beaureguard

".. going to take things away from (us) on behalf of the common good."

This covers more than money, this includes guns, rights, etc. She has just let slip what is her/their true intentions.


6 posted on 06/30/2004 5:39:49 AM PDT by looscnnn ("Live free or die; death is not the worst of evils" Gen. John Stark 1809)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: beaureguard

When I hear of events such as this, where the totalitarians of the left reveal their agenda and its goals in clear, unequivocal, and impossible to misunderstand terms, I just have to shake my head when I realize that HALF of the people in this country continue to align themselves with the dumbass Democrats!

The acceptance of Hildabeast's rant by her adoring crowd is a life lesson on how killers, like Karl Marx, who put down his monstrous plan in the Communist Manifesto, or Adolf Hitler, who outlined his agenda in Mein Kampf, were able to get away with mass murder through the complicity and assistance of their wild-eyed devotees. There was no validity to the canard that the people were unaware of the true nature of these creatures. The fact is, these demagogues and their followers are one. We are witnessing evil incarnate before our very eyes!

Truly, the stupidity of man knows no bounds!


10 posted on 06/30/2004 5:51:53 AM PDT by vanmorrison
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: beaureguard

This is no secret. They've been telling us this for years.


11 posted on 06/30/2004 5:55:13 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: beaureguard
Don't ignore the message here. You are not a free individual. You exist to serve the state. Hillary is here to show you the way.

No, I believe this is the democratic message: We will determine what is the common good for you (socialism) and will use the court system to implement it.

16 posted on 06/30/2004 6:17:50 AM PDT by sr4402
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson