Skip to comments.
THE REAL HILLARY JUST STOOD UP
New York Post ^
| 6/30/04
Posted on 06/29/2004 11:23:12 PM PDT by kattracks
June 30, 2004 -- "Many of you are well enough off that . . . the tax cuts may have helped you.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: clinton; commongood; communism; hillary; whoreofbabylon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 next last
1
posted on
06/29/2004 11:23:13 PM PDT
by
kattracks
Comment #2 Removed by Moderator
To: kattracks
3
posted on
06/29/2004 11:28:18 PM PDT
by
lowbridge
("You are an American. You are my brother. I would die for you." -Kurdish Sergeant)
To: Defender2
As I alluded in an earlier thread, the "things" she is referring to is obviously more than a tax cut.
4
posted on
06/29/2004 11:30:55 PM PDT
by
scott7278
("FR will NOT be used to help replace Bush with a Democrat." -- Jim Robinson, 2/01/04)
To: scott7278
5
posted on
06/29/2004 11:31:23 PM PDT
by
scott7278
("FR will NOT be used to help replace Bush with a Democrat." -- Jim Robinson, 2/01/04)
To: Defender2
"Many of you are well enough off that ... the tax cuts may have helped you. We're saying that for America to get back on track, we're probably going to cut that short and not give it to you. We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good."
-Hildabeast Klinton
"From each according to his means, too each according to his needs."
-Karl Marx
6
posted on
06/29/2004 11:31:42 PM PDT
by
South40
(Amnesty for ILLEGALS is a slap in the face to the USBP!)
To: Defender2
That's a hoot. Classic commiespeak.
Now, if she was a real social socialist, she would speak the "Soak the Rich" line.
ButTtTt, funny thing is, perhaps she observed that the Democratic Party is the real party of the Rich. Now that Michael Moore has a few coins in his pocket to jingle, he probably won't be preaching the Soak The Rich liberal gospel, either. Bill Clinton with his book money, c'mon, where is the Soak The Rich speech?
Oh yeah, I forgot about MULTI-MILLIONAIRE JOHN KERRY. I guess he wont' be laying society's ills on the back of the filthy rich, either.
So, the Dems come to the low point of having to reveal their real strategy; soak the average folks.
To: boycottliberalhollywood.com
8
posted on
06/29/2004 11:35:31 PM PDT
by
Defender2
(Defending Our Bill of Rights, Our Constitution, Our Country and Our Freedom!!!!)
To: kattracks
9
posted on
06/29/2004 11:35:48 PM PDT
by
lonevoice
(Some things have to be believed to be seen)
To: kattracks
"We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good."
JFC. Marx would be proud.
10
posted on
06/29/2004 11:36:21 PM PDT
by
MonroeDNA
(Hillary was in charge of the FBI files, which went into a data base: WHoDB. Genious hackers, expose)
To: boycottliberalhollywood.com
There is way too much being reported about the libs/socialists.
They're either defeated and they know it, so it doesn't matter what they say
or
The fix is in and it doesn't matter what they say.
11
posted on
06/29/2004 11:36:33 PM PDT
by
knarf
(A place where anyone can learn anything ... especially that which promotes clear thinking.)
To: boycottliberalhollywood.com
......she would speak the "Soak the Rich" line. Now it's "Soak Everybody".
(Hell, that's what the dems have done all along anyway.)
12
posted on
06/29/2004 11:36:39 PM PDT
by
Fiddlstix
(This Tagline for sale. (Presented by TagLines R US))
To: Defender2
We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good."This sounds like something coming out of Communist Red China !!!
How much of her money will be removed for the common good?
13
posted on
06/29/2004 11:37:39 PM PDT
by
concerned about politics
( Liberals are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
To: concerned about politics
#13. Probably none of her own, only everybody else's!!!!
14
posted on
06/29/2004 11:38:33 PM PDT
by
Defender2
(Defending Our Bill of Rights, Our Constitution, Our Country and Our Freedom!!!!)
To: kattracks
To: Defender2
#13. Probably none of her own, only everybody else's!!!!Socialist dictators like to keep the great unwashed uneducated and poor. They're easier to control when they live in inner city cages and have to beg for their food.
16
posted on
06/29/2004 11:42:11 PM PDT
by
concerned about politics
( Liberals are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
To: concerned about politics
#16. pretty good summation.
17
posted on
06/29/2004 11:44:27 PM PDT
by
Defender2
(Defending Our Bill of Rights, Our Constitution, Our Country and Our Freedom!!!!)
To: Defender2
"We're saying that for America to get back on track, we're probably going to cut that short and not give it to you. We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good."
The marxist arrogance in 'We' vs the 'you' is more than scary.
It is clear that despite her 'millions'; she is not including herself. . .or Bill. . .or even 'the Clintons'; or her 'ilk'. . .in these observations.
No. . .it is strictly a 'them vs us'. The rulers and the ruled. The subjugator and the subjects.
18
posted on
06/29/2004 11:46:53 PM PDT
by
cricket
To: cricket
#18. Your summation is pretty much on target as well!!!!
19
posted on
06/29/2004 11:48:57 PM PDT
by
Defender2
(Defending Our Bill of Rights, Our Constitution, Our Country and Our Freedom!!!!)
To: Defender2
Soak the rich is a pretty good term to attract the less affluent voter. Trickle down is a good term for the well off and their votes. The odd thing about both terms is that they both justify bigger government which suits the political elite.
20
posted on
06/29/2004 11:51:44 PM PDT
by
meenie
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson