Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Pharmacist's View on Gay Marriage
Agape Press ^ | 29 Jun 04 | J.R. Schoenle, Pharm.D.

Posted on 06/29/2004 5:07:44 PM PDT by xzins

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last
To: xzins

What does pharmacy have to do with anal sex? For that matter, what does marriage have to do with anal sex? I mean after all, isn't that all what gay marriage is about, recognition of the right to smear.... never mind


21 posted on 06/29/2004 5:49:05 PM PDT by Porterville (Fight Communism, vote Republican- and piss on france)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

BTTT


22 posted on 06/29/2004 5:50:09 PM PDT by Fiddlstix (This Tagline for sale. (Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

This guy makes too much common sense.


23 posted on 06/29/2004 5:50:35 PM PDT by dennisw (http://www.prophetofdoom.net/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

sad bump


24 posted on 06/29/2004 5:51:01 PM PDT by prognostigaator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Hmmm... what would be the liberal position if the "gay gene" were identified and hetrosexual couples began aborting children that carried that gene? I bet they'd finally find a case where abortion wasn't a "woman's right".


25 posted on 06/29/2004 5:58:48 PM PDT by sc2_ct
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: xzins
What bothers me is Christians refering to 'same sex marriage'. There can never be marriage between the same sex... only "same sex deviate acts of sin."
26 posted on 06/29/2004 5:59:08 PM PDT by Luke (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the Real fifi
If one of the problems with gays is promiscuity--as the author says--wouldn't marriage and monomgamy be preferable?

Why on earth would you think a piece of paper would make a promiscuous homosexual monogamous?

It doesn't work for heteros either ... they just don't have to pay as high a price for their promiscuity.

27 posted on 06/29/2004 6:02:44 PM PDT by iconoclast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: xzins
When we see a child walking into traffic, the ones who care try to stop the child from doing what's dangerous.

Can you imagine neighbors who would egg the child on????




That is an excellent analogy xzins.

May I add that not only do they "egg on the child" they exalt the child for doing what is dangerous calling those that disagree hate mongers etc..
28 posted on 06/29/2004 6:04:40 PM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Fine article!

Anyone know if the 13% number the author cites for he failure rate of condoms against HIV means per year or per use?

29 posted on 06/29/2004 6:07:41 PM PDT by megatherium
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Thanks very much for this (extremely powerful) gem of the factual truth on the gay agenda and it's horrific impact on our society.

Are you aware such public speaking is against the law in Canada and is labeled a 'HATE CRIME?'

30 posted on 06/29/2004 6:23:48 PM PDT by Happy2BMe (Ronald Reagan to Islamic Terrorism: YOU CAN RUN - BUT YOU CAN'T HIDE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the Real fifi
Evidence indicates that "monogamy" does not have the same meaning in gay relationships, with both "life partners" sharing multiple partners outside the relationship, and with the central relationship averaging something like 4 years.

Marriage has never guaranteed monogamy.
31 posted on 06/29/2004 6:24:03 PM PDT by sharktrager (Help Laura beat Tuh-Ray-Za http://scoreboards.hotornot.com/2004electionwives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sharktrager; the Real fifi

"Marriage has never guaranteed monogamy."

Exactly.
If a person is determined to screw around, they will do so regardless of marital status or how anyone will be hurt by it.
Such people, hetero or otherwise, do not care about consequences, they only care about their feelings and desires in the immediate moment.
Marital status only adds a layer of complication for them, something or someone to have to lie about or to.
Another thread of deciet in their unending web of lies.
'trager has it right, as do others stating the same thing.


32 posted on 06/29/2004 6:28:11 PM PDT by Darksheare (I boil trolls in their skins and devour their souls because I'm COMPASSIONATE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: the Real fifi

Best to try to stop those who are engaging in a deadly behavior.

I would target the basic behavior that is deadly. It sounds like you would attempt to allow that behavior but to control it.

That was also the argument with condoms....it has proven ineffective.


33 posted on 06/29/2004 6:28:54 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army and Supporting Bush/Cheney 2004!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Thank you. I also agree with the author. Furthermore, marriage is the union between a man and a woman for the purpose of procreation. Homosexual relationships do not fit the bill and to rearrange our society to suit those who claim they are homosexual is to further undermine our judeo/christian heritage. That is what the proponents of gay marriage want. Destruction of our organized society.


34 posted on 06/29/2004 6:31:31 PM PDT by MistyCA (For some...it's always going to be "A Nam Thing!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: megatherium
Anyone know if the 13% number the author cites for he failure rate of condoms against HIV means per year or per use?

Well, the 100% failure rates cited for other diseases wouldn't make sense on a per-use basis; on the other hand, per-year failure statistics aren't very meaningful without information about assumed frequency of contact.

35 posted on 06/29/2004 6:43:03 PM PDT by supercat (Why is it that the more "gun safety" laws are passed, the less safe my guns seem?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: supercat; megatherium

I'm guessing the answers to the condom questions lie in these particular footnoted sources:

[7] National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Health, Department of Health and Human Services. Workshop Summary: Scientific Evidence on Condom Effectiveness for Sexually Transmitted Disease Prevention, July 20, 2001

[8] Citing "Failed Efforts" to Inform Public of Condom "Ineffectiveness," Physician Groups, Politicians Ask CDC Head to Resign. July 25, 2001. Daily HIV/AIDS Report, The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation (Kaisernetwork.org). Internet on-line. http://www.kaisernetwork.org/daily_reports/rep_index.cfm?hint=1&DR_ID=5980

[9] Federal Panel on Condoms Offers Crucial Warnings to Sexually Active Americans, Says The Medical Institute for Sexual Health. NIH Condom Report Press Release. Media Advisories, Austin, Texas: The Medical Institute for Sexual Health, July 19, 2001

[10] A. Wald, A.G.M. Langenberg, K. Link, et. al., Effect of Condoms on Reducing the Transmission of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 2 from Men to Women. Journal of the American Medical Association 285 (2001):3100-3106


36 posted on 06/29/2004 6:48:35 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army and Supporting Bush/Cheney 2004!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: xzins

He's got guts!


37 posted on 06/29/2004 6:49:35 PM PDT by diamond6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

You can't stop it. It is ingrained. And I would contend that the best way to limit promiscuous sexual behavior is to allow permanent unions of homosexuals. I fail to see how this in a any way affects heterosexual marriage, but denying this right does seem to encourage the very behavior you claim to worry about.


38 posted on 06/29/2004 6:56:23 PM PDT by the Real fifi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Thank you.


39 posted on 06/29/2004 7:08:51 PM PDT by djreece
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: the Real fifi

wouldn't marriage and monomgamy be preferable?

When did marriage begin leading to monogamy?


40 posted on 06/29/2004 7:17:41 PM PDT by Damagro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson