Pinging.......
Pinging.......
Pinging.......
You know, I'm sure Brocchini wrote report after report after report about this case.
It occurs to me that maybe this report from which the part about the warehouse "witness" was "excised" may have been an outline of their evidence they were going to use to get one of the warrants they got. In which case, it would be SUPPOSED to only have the stuff that was favorable to the point they were trying to make to the judge they were seeking the warrant from. It would be SUPPOSED to only have stuff that was favorable to the police's theory of the crime at that time.
If that's the case, then this whole attack on the "excised" police report would be like Geragos attacking a legal memo written by Distaso, saying it wasn't "fair" b/c it didn't give equal time to the defense's legal arguments. That, of course, would be ridiculous, since such a memo is expected to give only its author's side of the issue.
Another O.J. Simpleton trial.
Peterson is going to be acquitted. Personally, I'm so sick of hearing about this case I'll be happy its no longer in the news, no matter the result.
It was one murder, in a year full of them.
---
I say...... tell Fox News and the rest........... to keep quiet on the Peterson case.
Just as I opened this thread I heard that the prosecution just finished re-direct and Geragos is again cross-examining the detective.
This judge is starting to get on my nerves. First, that juror should have been gone, pronto. Not the drawn-out dilly-dallying this judge indulged in, in the face of obvious juror incompetence. Now allowing Geragos to go on and on. I hope he makes him get to the point. Plus, I am not impressed that he felt the need to clamp down on police defending one of their own.
Ah, I supposed others have noted already that the "excised" portion of the report had turned up in another report on the witness. I and others surmised as much. I just heard the televised report on MSNBC. Didn't stop punditry gone berserk last week. Idiots!