1 posted on
06/28/2004 6:29:49 AM PDT by
kattracks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
To: kattracks
I heard on the radio that Jabba's film will not be considered for an Oscar because according to the spokesman, "70% of it is false." Probably not the response jabba was expecting but the academy probably didn't want a repeat of Bowling for Lies.
2 posted on
06/28/2004 6:33:57 AM PDT by
CzarNicky
(The problem with bad ideas is that they seemed like good ideas at the time.)
To: kattracks
I am glad that I have no desire to see this piece of trash. I might be something illegal if I saw this trashing of our soldiers.
3 posted on
06/28/2004 6:34:19 AM PDT by
Piquaboy
To: kattracks
Wrap him in pig skin...
oops..I forgot...he's already a pig.
Well, do something else that would be equivalent to him.
4 posted on
06/28/2004 6:34:54 AM PDT by
evad
(What's BAD for democRATs is GOOD for America)
To: kattracks
It's not worthy of the word "film". It's a crockumentary.
5 posted on
06/28/2004 6:36:15 AM PDT by
sarasota
To: kattracks
The fifth columnist movie reviewer,Jeff Simon, was positively aglow with praise for Moore's movie. Simon especially appreciated Moore's "sensitivity" in only showing a black screen when the movie showed scenes from
9/11.
Simon obviously misses the irony(intentionally??)in his praise of Moore's "sensitivity."
To: kattracks
The idea of putting ten dollars into this deception master's pocket repulsed me.
When then, did the author of this piece do so? Why are we helping to make Mooran a bigger name than he deserves to be? Why are people so "taken" by him? He's a loser, and the country is making him a winner by going to his crapomentries.
8 posted on
06/28/2004 6:38:50 AM PDT by
Rick.Donaldson
(There are 10 kinds of people in the world. Those who understand binary and those who don't.)
To: kattracks
BTTT to illustrate that Moore is a total A-hole.
9 posted on
06/28/2004 6:40:00 AM PDT by
b4its2late
(John Kerry changes positions more often than a Nevada prostitute!!!)
To: kattracks; sarasota; CzarNicky
I wouldn't mind seeing M.M. visit Fort Marcy Park. If he doesn't have his own car, it doesn't matter, Vince didn't need his.
Is that too tough?
10 posted on
06/28/2004 6:43:10 AM PDT by
beyond the sea
("a "blow by blow" account of Clinton's entire miserable existence")
To: kattracks
Moore is gambling this crude propaganda won't backfire, because, as he has stated numerous times, "the American public is stupid."
We'll see about that.
To: kattracks
It's setting movie-attendance records, evidently. Boy, that's as big a distortion as anything IN the film...
12 posted on
06/28/2004 6:43:55 AM PDT by
atomicpossum
(I give up! Entropy, you win!)
To: kattracks
Whatever happened to Hamas' offer to distribute the film throughout "Palestine"?
To: kattracks
Be careful mr. moore, you can't fit in a spiderhole!
To: kattracks
This article seems to have a sinister plea for people to go see the movie...makes me skeptical.
21 posted on
06/28/2004 7:00:14 AM PDT by
grumple
(I'm too old to worry about whether or not I'm a pain in your ass...)
To: kattracks
according to box office mojo the film grossed 21 mill this weekend at 800+ theatres. I keep hearing about 82 mill gross. What planet did that figure originate from??
25 posted on
06/28/2004 7:26:10 AM PDT by
mlmr
(Tag-less - Tag-free, anti-tag, in-tag-able, without tag, under-tagged, tag-deprived...)
To: kattracks
according to box office mojo the film grossed 21 mill this weekend at 800+ theatres. I keep hearing about 82 mill gross. What planet did that figure originate from??
26 posted on
06/28/2004 7:26:10 AM PDT by
mlmr
(Tag-less - Tag-free, anti-tag, in-tag-able, without tag, under-tagged, tag-deprived...)
To: kattracks
He wants us all to go see it? In a pigseye!! I don't need to stick my fingers in the fire to know it burns; I don't need to shoot my foot to know misusing guns can result in injury; I sure don't need to go to this stinkin' movie to know it's vile enough to make me nauseous. I refuse to give one cent of my money to this fat, traitorous jerk.
27 posted on
06/28/2004 7:27:34 AM PDT by
MizSterious
(First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
To: kattracks
"He basically takes a handful of soldiers who said and did some bad things and tries to portray them as what the American soldiers are all about in the war on terror."WHO??????........JOHN KERRY??????????......OHHHH, sorry, it's MICHAEL MOORE....coulda fooled me, for a minute there I thought it was 1970!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
30 posted on
06/28/2004 7:37:52 AM PDT by
soozla
("F.U. - LONG OVERDUE!!" - BUSH/CHENEY '04)
To: kattracks
Really, it's the Hollywoodian "PG" version of Babes of Bagdad. It's pornography portrayed as "art". Geez, and Maplethorpe got about as much kudos from the left as Moore is for this film. Moore says Americans are dumb. He may not be too far off. He does an "Emperor's Clothing" flick and rakes in the dough from mostly, his political followers. Whoa.
31 posted on
06/28/2004 7:47:39 AM PDT by
Alia
(California -- It's Groovy! Baby!)
To: kattracks
I wouldn't give Moore the sweat off my back let alone $10.00 for a ticket. Moore is human trash with a lost soul.
37 posted on
06/28/2004 9:32:13 AM PDT by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
To: kattracks
This is going to work against the LLL. It is based mostly on Moore's well-known contempt for the American people. Lumpy Riefenstahl's arrogance is breathtaking. He and his media followers have pulled out all the stops to make this film the anthem and symbol of LLL activism in the 21st Century, and it will backfire disastrously. He and the media are guilty of monumental hubris in believing that this crude work of propaganda will enhance their cause. It will destroy them.
39 posted on
06/28/2004 9:46:07 AM PDT by
atomic conspiracy
(A few words for the media: Julius Streicher, follow his path, share his fate.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson